Assessing water scarcity in agricultural production system based on the generalized water resources and water footprint framework

被引:153
|
作者
Cao Xinchun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu Mengyang [2 ]
Guo Xiangping [2 ,3 ]
Zheng Yalian [2 ]
Gong Yan [2 ]
Wu Nan [2 ]
Wang Weiguang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Hohai Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Efficient Irrigat Drainage & Agr Soil Wat, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water stress index; Crop production; Blue-green water; Grey water footprint; China; GRAIN PRODUCTION; CROP PRODUCTION; CHINA; IRRIGATION; GREEN; BLUE; CONSUMPTION; SECURITY; EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.191
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An indicator, agricultural water stress index (AWSI), was established based blue-green water resources and water footprint framework for regional water scarcity in agricultural production industry evaluation. AWSI is defined as the ratio of the total agricultural water footprint (AWF) to water resources availability (AWR) in a single year. Then, the temporal and spatial patterns of AWSI in China during 1999-2014 were analyzed based on the provincial AWR and AWF quantification. The results show that the annual AWR in China has been maintained at approximately 2540 Gm(3), of which blue water accounted for >70%. The national annual AWF was approximately 1040 Gm(3) during the study period and comprised 65.6% green, 12.7% blue and 21.7% grey WFs The space difference in both the AWF for per unit arable land (AWFI) and its composition was significant. National AWSI was calculated as 0.413 and showed an increasing trend in the observed period. This index increased from 0.320 (mid-water stress level) in 2000 to 0.490 (high water stress level) in the present due to the expansion of the agricultural production scale. The Northern provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities (PAMs) have been facing high water stress, particularly the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, which was at a very high water stress level (AWSI > 0.800). Humid South China faces increasingly severe water scarcity, and most of the PAMs in the region have converted from low water stress level (AWSI = 0.100-0.200) to mid water stress level (AWSI = 0.200-0.400). The AWSI is more appropriate for reflecting the regional water scarcity than the existing water stress index (WSI) or the blue water scarcity (BWS) indicator, particularly for the arid agricultural production regions due to the revealed environmental impacts of agricultural production. China should guarantee the sustainable use of agricultural water resources by reducing its crop water footprint. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 597
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agricultural water and land resources allocation considering carbon sink/ source and water scarcity/degradation footprint
    Wu, Hui
    Guo, Shanshan
    Guo, Ping
    Shan, Baoying
    Zhang, Yan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 819
  • [2] The Water Footprint of European Agricultural Imports: Hotspots in the Context of Water Scarcity
    Dolganova, Iulia
    Mikosch, Natalia
    Berger, Markus
    Nunez, Montserrat
    Mueller-Frank, Andrea
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    [J]. RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (03):
  • [3] A framework for assessing the sustainability of a water resources system
    Kjeldsen, TR
    Rosbjerg, D
    [J]. REGIONAL MANAGEMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, 2001, (268): : 107 - 113
  • [4] Water scarcity assessment in Iran's agricultural sector using the water footprint concept
    Dehghanpir, Shahla
    Bazrafshan, Ommolbanin
    Ramezani Etedali, Hadi
    Holisaz, Arashk
    Collins, Brian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023,
  • [5] Three-dimensional agricultural water scarcity assessment based on water footprint: A study from a humid agricultural area in China
    Yan, Yunan
    Wang, Run
    Chen, Si
    Zhang, Yu
    Sun, Qianli
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 857
  • [6] Assessing the carbon footprint of water production
    Strutt, Justin
    Wilson, Slan
    Shorney-Darby, Holly
    Shaw, Andrew
    Byers, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2008, 100 (06): : 80 - +
  • [7] Water scarcity assessment based on estimated ultimate energy recovery and water footprint framework during shale gas production in the Changning play
    Wu, Xia
    Xia, Jun
    Guan, Baoshan
    Liu, Ping
    Ning, Like
    Yi, Xinbing
    Yang, Lifeng
    Hu, Sheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 241
  • [8] Water resources in Saudi Arabia: trends in rainfall, water consumption, and analysis of agricultural water footprint
    Natalia Odnoletkova
    Tadeusz W. Patzek
    [J]. npj Sustainable Agriculture, 1 (1):
  • [9] Water Use Efficiency and Sensitivity Assessment for Agricultural Production System from the Water Footprint Perspective
    Wang, Weiwei
    Wang, Jigan
    Cao, Xinchun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 17
  • [10] Water Resources, Water Scarcity Challenges, and Perspectives
    Shevah, Yehuda
    [J]. WATER CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS ON A GLOBAL SCALE, 2015, 1206 : 185 - 219