Mismatch negativity: No difference between controls and abstinent alcoholics

被引:17
|
作者
Fein, G
Whitlow, B
Finn, P
机构
[1] Neurobehav Res Inc, Corte Madera, CA 94925 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN USA
关键词
Mismatch negativity; alcoholism; EEG; family history density; externalizing symptoms;
D O I
10.1097/01.ALC.0000107199.26934.46
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A number of studies have examined the amplitude of the mismatch negativity (MMN) evoked potential as a measure of a brain inhibitory deficit in alcoholics or those at risk for alcoholism. The current study examined MMN in alcoholics abstinent an average of 6.7 years (with a minimum of six months abstinence) compared to controls. This study examined the association of MMN with alcoholism family history density, with indices of the presence and severity of externalizing disorders (a risk-factor for alcoholism), and with alcohol use variables. Methods: Electroencephalograms were gathered on 76 subjects (38 controls, 38 abstinent alcoholics) during a nonattending mismatch negativity experiment. Measures of alcoholism family history density, disinhibited personality traits, and antisocial symptoms served as measures of risk-factors known to be associated with a genetic liability to alcoholism. Alcohol use variables were used as measures of alcoholism severity. Results: There were no differences in MMN amplitude or latency between controls and abstinent alcoholics. There also were no significant associations between MMN measures and the measures of risk for alcoholism or with the severity of alcohol use or duration of abstinence. Conclusions: The results suggest that MMN is neither affected in chronic alcoholics nor associated with alcoholism vulnerability, and thus does not reflect a trait marker of alcoholism or alcoholism risk. The current results do not address effects on MMN of acute alcohol ingestion or withdrawal from alcohol.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE MISMATCH NEGATIVITY OF THE ERP IN ABSTINENT ALCOHOLICS
    GOMEZPERRETTA, C
    PORJESZ, B
    BEGLEITER, H
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1988, 12 (02) : 334 - 334
  • [2] Mismatch negativity: No difference between treatment-naive alcoholics and controls
    Fein, G
    McGillivray, S
    Finn, P
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 28 (12) : 1861 - 1866
  • [3] Mismatch negativity in young children of alcoholics
    Cadaveira, F
    Corral, M
    Rodriguez, HS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 33 (01) : 93 - 94
  • [4] Mismatch negativity in chronic alcoholics preliminary results
    Polo, MD
    Escera, C
    Gual, A
    Serra, JM
    Diaz, R
    Grau, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 25 (01) : 58 - 58
  • [5] Leptin and cellular and innate immunity in abstinent alcoholics and controls
    Motivala, SJ
    Dang, J
    Obradovic, T
    Meadows, GG
    Butch, AW
    Irwin, MR
    [J]. ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 27 (11): : 1819 - 1824
  • [6] Mismatch negativity and auditory sensory memory in chronic alcoholics
    Polo, MD
    Escera, C
    Gual, A
    Grau, C
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 23 (11) : 1744 - 1750
  • [7] DELAYED PEAK LATENCY OF THE MISMATCH NEGATIVITY IN SCHIZOPHRENICS AND ALCOHOLICS
    KATHMANN, N
    WAGNER, M
    RENDTORFF, N
    ENGEL, RR
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 37 (10) : 754 - 757
  • [8] Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls
    Nancy M. Petry
    [J]. Psychopharmacology, 2001, 154 : 243 - 250
  • [9] Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls
    Petry, NM
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 154 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [10] The difference in Mismatch negativity between the acute and post-acute phase of schizophrenia
    Shinozaki, N
    Yabe, H
    Sato, Y
    Hiruma, T
    Sutoh, T
    Nashida, T
    Matsuoka, T
    Kaneko, S
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 59 (02) : 105 - 119