Weed risk assessment: a way forward or a waste of time?

被引:156
|
作者
Hulme, Philip E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Bioprotect Res Ctr, Canterbury, New Zealand
关键词
biological invasions; biosecurity; exotic; heuristics; pest management; PLANT INVASIONS; ALIEN PLANTS; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; ASSESSMENT SYSTEM; SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION-SIZE; CLIMATIC NICHE; SUCCESS; INVASIVENESS; NATURALIZATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02069.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Many alien weeds pose significant environmental and/or economic threats across the globe, and methods to assess the potential risk of species introductions are key components in the management of plant invasions. Three broad approaches have been adopted in weed risk assessment: quantitative statistical models, semi-quantitative scoring and qualitative expert assessment. Yet, the effectiveness of these different approaches is rarely evaluated. By bringing together perspectives drawn from statistics, complexity theory, bioeconomics and cognitive psychology, this review presents the first interdisciplinary appraisal of whether weed risk assessment is a valuable tool in the management of plant invasions. 2. Problems in obtaining an objective measure of the hazards posed by weeds, challenges of predicting complex hierarchical and nonlinear systems, difficulties in quantifying uncertainty and variability, as well as cognitive biases in expert judgement, all limit the utility of current risk assessment approaches. The accuracy of weed risk assessment protocols is usually insufficient, given inherent low base-rates even when the costs and benefits of decisions are taken into account, and implies that the predictive value of weed risk assessment is questionable. 3. Current practices could be improved to address consistent hazard identification, encompass a hierarchy of spatio-temporal scales, incorporate uncertainty, generate realistic base-rates, and train risk assessors to limit cognitive biases. However, such refinements may still fail to predict weed risks any better than a knowledge of prior invasion history and quality of climate match. 4. Alternative approaches include scenario planning that seeks qualitative inputs regarding hypothetical events to facilitate long-range planning using multiple alternatives each explicit in their treatment of uncertainty. This represents a change from prevention towards adaptive management where the difficulty in prediction is acknowledged and investment targets early detection, mitigation and management. 5. Synthesis and applications. Scenario planning may be particularly suitable for weeds as they can be rapidly surveyed and have sufficiently long lag phases between naturalisation and invasion that early detection is often feasible. If integrated with assessments of ecosystem vulnerability to invasion and interventions to improve ecosystem resilience, it would deliver a robust post-border approach to invasive plant management. This approach would address threats from new introductions as well as 'sleeper weeds' already present in a region.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 19
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social media: the way forward or a waste of time for physicians?
    DeCamp, M.
    Cunningham, A. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2013, 43 (04): : 318 - 320
  • [2] The way forward for risk assessment of nanomaterials in solid media
    Scott-Fordsmand, Janeck J.
    Peijnenburg, Willie
    Amorim, Monica J. B.
    Landsiedel, Robert
    Oorts, Koen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2016, 218 : 1363 - 1364
  • [3] Asbestos Risk Assessment in Pakistan: Current Scenario and Way Forward
    Khan, A. Ahmed
    Nafees, A. Ahmed
    Fatmi, Z.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2013, 4 (01): : 50 - 51
  • [4] Microbiological safety of poultry meat: risk assessment as a way forward
    Kelly, LA
    Hartnett, E
    Gettinby, G
    Fazil, A
    Snary, E
    Wooldridge, M
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2003, 59 (04) : 495 - 508
  • [5] A Universal Framework for the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Is This the Way Forward?
    Stuart Walker
    Neil McAuslane
    Lawrence Liberti
    James Leong
    Sam Salek
    [J]. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2015, 49 : 17 - 25
  • [6] A Universal Framework for the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Is This the Way Forward?
    Walker, Stuart
    McAuslane, Neil
    Liberti, Lawrence
    Leong, James
    Salek, Sam
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2015, 49 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [7] CONFERENCE SHOWS WAY FORWARD IN WASTE TREATMENT
    不详
    [J]. PROCESS TECHNOLOGY, 1973, 18 (8-9): : 311 - 312
  • [8] HAZARDOUS-WASTE MANAGEMENT - THE WAY FORWARD
    WILSON, DC
    PARKER, CJ
    [J]. RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION, 1987, 14 : 93 - 104
  • [9] HAZARDOUS-WASTE MANAGEMENT - THE WAY FORWARD
    BURNS, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTION OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1988, 2 (03): : 285 - 289
  • [10] Way forward: Geriatric frailty assessment as risk predictor in gastric cancer surgery
    Tegels, Juul J. W.
    Stoot, Jan H. M. B.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 7 (10): : 223 - 225