Can investors anticipate post-IPO mergers and acquisitions?

被引:19
|
作者
Anderson, Christopher W. [1 ]
Huang, Jian [2 ]
Torna, Gokhan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Sch Business, 1654 Naismith Dr, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Towson Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Towson, MD 21252 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Coll Business, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
Initial public offerings (IPOs); Mergers and acquisitions (M&A); Deal structure; Merger anticipation; INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; FIRMS; UNDERWRITER; ALLOCATION; DECISION; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Given the frequency and value implications of post-IPO merger and acquisition activity, we investigate empirically whether investors can utilize information based on IPO deal structure to predict merger and acquisition activity among newly public firms. Consistent with the hypothesis that some firms conduct IPOs to facilitate future M&A activity, we find that aspects of IPO deal structure predict whether a newly public firm subsequently becomes a bidder or target. These characteristics include underwriter quality, promotional activity, pricing, proceeds, ownership structure, and issuance activity suggestive of market timing. Investors appear to rely on these observable aspects of a firm's going public process to anticipate the implications of M&A activity for security valuation. Specifically, when newly public firms with IPO deal structures predictive of acquisition activity announce an acquisition their stock returns are indistinguishable from zero. In contrast, abnormal returns to acquisition announcements by unlikely or surprise bidders are positive on average. These results suggest that the going public process has important implications for future M&A activity and valuation. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 521
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Third-party certification and post-IPO acquisitions
    Blomkvist, Magnus
    Felixson, Karl
    Loflund, Anders
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (31) : 3436 - 3447
  • [2] How IPO firms' product innovation strategy affects the likelihood of post-IPO acquisitions?
    Kooli, Maher
    Zhang, Aoran
    Zhao, Yunfei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2022, 72
  • [4] The greater the investor attention, the better the post-IPO performance? A view of pre-IPO and post-IPO investor attention
    Zhao, Yi
    Wang, Nan
    Zhang, Luyang
    Sun, Baiqing
    Yang, Yuchen
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2022, 63
  • [5] Do institutional investors reinforce or reduce agency problems? Earnings management and the post-IPO performance
    Lo, Huai-Chun
    Wu, Ruei-Shian
    Kweh, Qian Long
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 52 : 62 - 76
  • [6] Which Trades of Institutional Investors are More Informed in the Post-IPO Market? Evidence from China
    He, Jingbin
    Liao, Jingchi
    Ma, Xinru
    Wu, Fei
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2022, 58 (09) : 2438 - 2452
  • [7] Innovation capability and post-IPO performance
    Guo R.-J.
    Zhou N.
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2016, 46 (2) : 335 - 357
  • [8] Directors' Dealing and Post-IPO Performance
    Hoque, Hafiz
    Lasfer, Meziane
    [J]. EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 21 (01) : 178 - 204
  • [9] THE EFFECTS OF ACTIVIST INVESTORS ON FIRMS' MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
    Swidler, Steve
    Tri Trinh
    Yost, Keven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH, 2019, 42 (01) : 181 - 201
  • [10] Signaling Type and Post-IPO Performance
    Deb, Palash
    [J]. EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 10 (02) : 99 - 116