Validity of a cognitive computerized assessment system in brain-injured patients

被引:32
|
作者
Keith, MS [1 ]
Stanislav, SW
Wesnes, KA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Coll Pharm, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Florida A&M Univ, Coll Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32307 USA
[3] Brown Sch Rehabil Ctr, Austin, TX USA
[4] Cognit Drug Res, Reading, Berks, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/026990598121945
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The primary objective of the study was to investigate the criterion validity of the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerized system in assessing cognitive functioning among persons with brain injury or other organic illness. Understanding the cognitive effects of pharmacotherapy is important in improving long-term rehabilitation outcomes in persons with organic disorders. The CDR system evaluates cognitive skills of attention, short-term or working memory, long-term memory, and visuomotor and motor functioning. For validity testing, correlation coefficients were obtained from an analysis of CDR scores to IQ and Folstein Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) scores. Subtests of the CDR system that correlated with the MMSE were choice reaction time (R = -0.542, p = 0.04), spatial working memory (R = 0.938, p = 0.01), and word recognition (R = -0.949, p = 0.01). These tests primarily measured attention and working memory. Correlations between the CDR and IQ scores were not evident. In summary, the data suggest the CDR assessment system has high patient acceptability by persons with traumatic brain injury, and is a useful tool in assessing certain domains of cognition, specifically short-term memory, discrimination, and identification skills.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1043
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LOEWENSTEIN OCCUPATIONAL-THERAPY COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (LOTCA) BATTERY FOR BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    KATZ, N
    ITZKOVICH, M
    AVERBUCH, S
    ELAZAR, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1989, 43 (03): : 184 - 192
  • [2] Psychiatric confounds in the assessment of brain-injured patients
    Johnson, SA
    Penkman, LC
    Strauss, EH
    Sherman, EMS
    Spellacy, F
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 1998, 12 (02): : 289 - 289
  • [3] DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF COGNITIVE DEFICIT IN BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS
    WILLIAMS, HL
    LUBIN, A
    GIESEKING, CF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1959, 23 (04): : 300 - 305
  • [4] ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION OF MEMORY DEFICITS IN BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS
    GRAFMAN, J
    MATTHEWS, CG
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 32 (JAN): : 33 - 33
  • [5] COGNITIVE AND MOTOR DEFICITS IN SELECTED UNILATERAL BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS
    AXELROD, BN
    ROSENBAUM, G
    ADAMS, KM
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1991, 72 (03) : 767 - 771
  • [6] Assessment of Aspiration Risk Using the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability in Brain-Injured Patients With Cognitive Impairment
    Kwon, Shinyoung
    Sim, Jaehoon
    Park, Joonhyun
    Jung, Youngsoo
    Cho, Kye Hee
    Min, Kyunghoon
    Kim, Min Young
    Kim, Jong Moon
    Im, Sang Hee
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [7] TRACHEOTOMY IN BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS
    TROUPP, H
    [J]. EYE EAR NOSE AND THROAT MONTHLY, 1966, 45 (04): : 49 - &
  • [8] Construct Validity of Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Brain-Injured Children
    Barney, S.
    Allen, D.
    Stolberg, P.
    Mayfield, J.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (06) : 528 - 529
  • [9] INTERVENTIONS FOR COGNITIVE DEFICITS IN BRAIN-INJURED ADULTS
    DILLER, L
    GORDON, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 49 (06) : 822 - 834
  • [10] Assessment and detection of pain in noncommunicative severely brain-injured patients
    Schnakers, Caroline
    Chatelle, Camille
    Majerus, Steve
    Gosseries, Olivia
    De Val, Marie
    Laureys, Steven
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2010, 10 (11) : 1725 - 1731