Coke Reactivity in Simulated Blast Furnace Shaft Conditions

被引:33
|
作者
Haapakangas, Juho [1 ]
Suopajarvi, Hannu [1 ]
Iljana, Mikko [1 ]
Kemppainen, Antti [1 ]
Mattila, Olli [2 ]
Heikkinen, Eetu-Pekka [1 ]
Samuelsson, Caisa [3 ]
Fabritius, Timo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Proc Met, POB 4300, Oulu 90014, Finland
[2] SSAB Europe Oy, Rautaruukintie 155,POB 93, Raahe 92101, Finland
[3] Lulea Univ Technol, Div Minerals & Met Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
关键词
CARBON-DIOXIDE; CHAR GASIFICATION; CO2; GASIFICATION; KINETIC-ANALYSIS; IRON-COKE; COAL; STEAM; H2O; REDUCTION; GAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11663-016-0677-y
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Despite the fact that H-2 and H2O are always present in the gas atmosphere of a blast furnace shaft, their role in the solution-loss reactions of coke has not been thoroughly examined. This study focuses on how H-2 and H2O affect the reaction behavior and whether a strong correlation can be found between reactivity in the conditions of the CRI test (Coke Reactivity Index) and various simulated blast furnace shaft gas atmospheres. Partial replacement of CO/CO2 with H-2/H2O was found to significantly increase the reactivity of all seven coke grades at 1373 K (1100 A degrees C). H-2 and H2O, however, did not have a significant effect on the threshold temperature of gasification. The reactivity increasing effect was found to be temperature dependent and clearly at its highest at 1373 K (1100 A degrees C). Mathematical models were used to calculate activation energies for the gasification, which were notably lower for H2O gasification compared to CO2 indicating the higher reactivity of H2O. The reactivity results in gas atmospheres with CO2 as the sole gasifying component did not directly correlate with reactivity results in gases also including H2O, which suggests that the widely used CRI test is not entirely accurate for estimating coke reactivity in the blast furnace.
引用
收藏
页码:2357 / 2370
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coke Reactivity in Simulated Blast Furnace Shaft Conditions
    Juho Haapakangas
    Hannu Suopajärvi
    Mikko Iljana
    Antti Kemppainen
    Olli Mattila
    Eetu-Pekka Heikkinen
    Caisa Samuelsson
    Timo Fabritius
    [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2016, 47 : 2357 - 2370
  • [2] Coke reactivity under simulated blast furnace conditions
    van der Velden, B
    Trouw, J
    Chaigneau, R
    van den Berg, J
    [J]. 58TH IRONMAKING CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 58 : 275 - 285
  • [3] Sinter reduction in simulated blast-furnace conditions in the presence of coke with various reactivity
    Sadowski, A
    Budzyn, S
    Dlugosz, A
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF METALLURGY, 2003, 48 (04): : 467 - 477
  • [4] Coke Degradation under Simulated Blast Furnace Conditions
    Xing, Xing
    Rogers, Harold
    Zhang, Guangqing
    Hockings, Kim
    Zulli, Paul
    Ostrovski, Oleg
    [J]. ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 56 (05) : 786 - 793
  • [5] Coke texture, reactivity and tumbler strength after reaction under simulated blast furnace conditions
    Zhang Weiji
    Shi Ting
    Zhang Qifeng
    Cao Yinping
    Qian Hui
    Wu Xinci
    Li Jing
    Zhang Qun
    Yang Guangzhi
    Yang Junhe
    [J]. FUEL, 2019, 251 : 218 - 223
  • [6] COKE REACTIVITY IN BLAST-FURNACE
    GOLDSHTEIN, NL
    ZLATOUSTOVSKII, DM
    ZVEREVA, NN
    ZEMLYANSKOV, VA
    [J]. STEEL IN THE USSR, 1975, 5 (11): : 585 - 588
  • [7] Coke Reactivity under Blast Furnace Conditions and in the CSR/CRI Test
    Lundgren, Maria
    Okvist, Lena Sundqvist
    Bjorkman, Bo
    [J]. STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 80 (06) : 396 - 401
  • [8] INFLUENCE OF HYDROGEN ON REACTIVITY OF COKE IN BLAST FURNACE
    KORNEV, VK
    SHAVRIN, SV
    [J]. STEEL IN THE USSR, 1971, 1 (02): : 96 - &
  • [9] Effect of coke reactivity and nut coke on blast furnace operation
    RWTH Aachen University, Department of Ferrous Metallurgy, Intzestrasse 1, 52072 Aachen, Germany
    [J]. Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2009, 3 (234-240):
  • [10] Effect of coke reactivity and nut coke on blast furnace operation
    Babich, A.
    Senk, D.
    Gudenau, H. W.
    [J]. IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING, 2009, 36 (03) : 222 - 229