Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms

被引:18
|
作者
Habel, Laurel A. [1 ,2 ]
Lipson, Jafi A. [3 ]
Achacoso, Ninah [1 ]
Rothstein, Joseph H. [2 ]
Yaffe, Martin J. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Liang, Rhea Y. [3 ]
Acton, Luana [1 ]
McGuire, Valerie [2 ]
Whittemore, Alice S. [2 ]
Rubin, Daniel L. [3 ]
Sieh, Weiva [2 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente No Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Div Epidemiol, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Imaging, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Ontario Inst Canc Res, Smarter Imaging Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Breast cancer; Mammography; Mammographic density; Risk factors; Epidemiology;
D O I
10.1186/s13058-016-0715-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) has largely replaced film-screen mammography in the US. Breast density assessed from film mammograms is strongly associated with breast cancer risk, but data are limited for processed FFDM images used for clinical care. Methods: We conducted a case-control study nested among non-Hispanic white female participants of the Research Program in Genes, Environment and Health of Kaiser Permanente Northern California who were aged 40 to 74 years and had screening mammograms acquired on Hologic FFDM machines. Cases (n = 297) were women with a first invasive breast cancer diagnosed after a screening FFDM. For each case, up to five controls (n = 1149) were selected, matched on age and year of FFDM and image batch number, and who were still under follow-up and without a history of breast cancer at the age of diagnosis of the matched case. Percent density (PD) and dense area (DA) were assessed by a radiological technologist using Cumulus. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for breast cancer associated with PD and DA, modeled continuously in standard deviation (SD) increments and categorically in quintiles, after adjusting for body mass index, parity, first-degree family history of breast cancer, breast area, and menopausal hormone use. Results: Median intra-reader reproducibility was high with a Pearson's r of 0.956 (range 0.902 to 0.983) for replicate PD measurements across 23 image batches. The overall mean was 20.02 (SD, 14.61) for PD and 27.63 cm(2) (18. 22 cm2) for DA. The adjusted ORs for breast cancer associated with each SD increment were 1.70 (95 % confidence interval, 1.41-2.04) for PD, and 1.54 (1.34-1.77) for DA. The adjusted ORs for each quintile were: 1.00 (ref.), 1.49 (0.91-2.45), 2.57 (1.54-4.30), 3.22 (1.91-5.43), 4.88 (2.78-8.55) for PD, and 1.00 (ref.), 1.43 (0.85-2.40), 2.53 (1.53-4.19), 2.85 (1.73-4.69), 3.48 (2.14-5.65) for DA. Conclusions: PD and DA measured using Cumulus on processed FFDM images are positively associated with breast cancer risk, with similar magnitudes of association as previously reported for film-screen mammograms. Processed digital mammograms acquired for routine clinical care in a general practice setting are suitable for breast density and cancer research.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms
    Laurel A. Habel
    Jafi A. Lipson
    Ninah Achacoso
    Joseph H. Rothstein
    Martin J. Yaffe
    Rhea Y. Liang
    Luana Acton
    Valerie McGuire
    Alice S. Whittemore
    Daniel L. Rubin
    Weiva Sieh
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 18
  • [2] Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods
    Eng, Amanda
    Gallant, Zoe
    Shepherd, John
    McCormack, Valerie
    Li, Jingmei
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Vinnicombe, Sarah
    Allen, Steve
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (05)
  • [3] Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study
    Krishnan, Kavitha
    Baglietto, Laura
    Stone, Jennifer
    McLean, Catriona
    Southey, Melissa C.
    English, Dallas R.
    Giles, Graham G.
    Hopper, John L.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [4] Mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer in a German case-control study
    Heusinger, Katharina
    Loehberg, Christian R.
    Haeberle, Lothar
    Jud, Sebastian M.
    Klingsiek, Peter
    Hein, Alexander
    Bayer, Christian M.
    Rauh, Claudia
    Uder, Michael
    Cavallaro, Alexander
    May, Matthias S.
    Adamietz, Boris
    Schulz-Wendtland, Ruediger
    Wittenberg, Thomas
    Wagner, Florian
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Fasching, Peter A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [5] Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study
    Kavitha Krishnan
    Laura Baglietto
    Jennifer Stone
    Catriona McLean
    Melissa C. Southey
    Dallas R. English
    Graham G. Giles
    John L. Hopper
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 17
  • [6] Risk Analysis of Breast Cancer by Using Bilateral Mammographic Density Differences: A Case-Control Study
    Zhang, Zhang
    Zhang, Xiaoyong
    Chen, Jiaqi
    Takane, Yumi
    Yanagaki, Satoru
    Mori, Naoko
    Ichiji, Kei
    Kato, Katsuaki
    Yanagaki, Mika
    Ebata, Akiko
    Miyashita, Minoru
    Ishida, Takanori
    Homma, Noriyasu
    [J]. TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 261 (02): : 139 - 150
  • [7] Change of mammographic density predicts the risk of contralateral breast cancer - a case-control study
    Sandberg, Maria E. C.
    Li, Jingmei
    Hall, Per
    Hartman, Mikael
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    Humphreys, Keith
    Czene, Kamila
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (04)
  • [8] Change of mammographic density predicts the risk of contralateral breast cancer - a case-control study
    Maria EC Sandberg
    Jingmei Li
    Per Hall
    Mikael Hartman
    Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
    Keith Humphreys
    Kamila Czene
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 15
  • [9] Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk in the Saudi population: a case-control study using visual and automated methods
    Aloufi, Areej S.
    Alnaeem, Abdulrahman N.
    Almousa, Abeer S.
    Hashem, Amani M.
    Malik, Mehreen A.
    Altahan, Fatina M.
    Elsharkawi, Mahmoud M.
    Almasar, Khalid A.
    Elmahdy, Manal H.
    Squires, Steven E.
    Alzimami, Khalid S.
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Astley, Susan M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1134):
  • [10] Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study
    Warner, Erica T.
    Rice, Megan S.
    Zeleznik, Oana A.
    Fowler, Erin E.
    Murthy, Divya
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Bertrand, Kimberly A.
    Rosner, Bernard A.
    Heine, John
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    [J]. NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2021, 7 (01)