The cis-regulatory code of Hox function in Drosophila

被引:37
|
作者
Sorge, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Ha, Nati [1 ,2 ]
Polychronidou, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Friedrich, Jana [1 ,2 ]
Bezdan, Daniela [3 ]
Kaspar, Petra [1 ,2 ]
Schaefer, Martin H. [3 ]
Ossowski, Stephan [3 ]
Henz, Stefan R. [3 ]
Mundorf, Juliane [1 ,2 ]
Raetzer, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
Papagiannouli, Fani [1 ,2 ]
Lohmann, Ingrid [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, CellNetworks Cluster Excellence, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg, Ctr Organismal Studies COS Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Max Planck Inst Dev Biol, Tubingen, Germany
来源
EMBO JOURNAL | 2012年 / 31卷 / 15期
关键词
ChIP-seq; Deformed; Drosophila; Hox; transcriptional gene regulation; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-BINDING; CBP-MEDIATED ACETYLATION; DNA-SEQUENCE RECOGNITION; HOMEOTIC GENE; CHROMATIN-IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; HEAD DEVELOPMENT; HOMEOBOX GENES; SELECTOR GENE; HUMAN GENOME; TARGET GENE;
D O I
10.1038/emboj.2012.179
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Precise gene expression is a fundamental aspect of organismal function and depends on the combinatorial interplay of transcription factors (TFs) with cis-regulatory DNA elements. While much is known about TF function in general, our understanding of their cell type-specific activities is still poor. To address how widely expressed transcriptional regulators modulate downstream gene activity with high cellular specificity, we have identified binding regions for the Hox TF Deformed (Dfd) in the Drosophila genome. Our analysis of architectural features within Hox cis-regulatory response elements (HREs) shows that HRE structure is essential for cell type-specific gene expression. We also find that Dfd and Ultrabithorax (Ubx), another Hox TF specifying different morphological traits, interact with non-overlapping regions in vivo, despite their similar DNA binding preferences. While Dfd and Ubx HREs exhibit comparable design principles, their motif compositions and motif-pair associations are distinct, explaining the highly selective interaction of these Hox proteins with the regulatory environment. Thus, our results uncover the regulatory code imprinted in Hox enhancers and elucidate the mechanisms underlying functional specificity of TFs in vivo. The EMBO Journal (2012) 31, 3323-3333. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.179; Published online 10 July 2012
引用
收藏
页码:3323 / 3333
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The cis-regulatory code of Hox function in Drosophila (vol 31, pg 3323, 2012)
    Sorge, Sebastian
    Ha, Nati
    Polychronidou, Maria
    Friedrich, Jana
    Bezdan, Daniela
    Kaspar, Petra
    Schaefer, Martin H.
    Ossowski, Stephan
    Henz, Stefan R.
    Mundorf, Juliane
    Raetzer, Jenny
    Papagiannouli, Fani
    Lohmann, Ingrid
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 2015, 34 (22): : 2862 - 2862
  • [2] Decoding embryonic cis-regulatory modules at Drosophila Hox genes
    Drewell, Robert A.
    Ho, Margaret C.
    Goetz, Sara E.
    Schiller, Benjamin J.
    Bae, Esther
    Allen, John M.
    Bender, Welcome
    Fisher, William
    Celniker, Susan E.
    Drewell, Robert A.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 331 (02) : 400 - 400
  • [3] Deciphering the transcriptional cis-regulatory code
    Yanez-Cuna, J. Omar
    Kvon, Evgeny Z.
    Stark, Alexander
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2013, 29 (01) : 11 - 22
  • [4] Evolution of Cis-Regulatory Sequences in Drosophila
    Simpson, Pat
    Ayyar, Savita
    [J]. LONG-RANGE CONTROL OF GENE EXPRESSION, 2008, 61 : 67 - 106
  • [5] A cis-regulatory map of the Drosophila genome
    Negre, Nicolas
    Brown, Christopher D.
    Ma, Lijia
    Bristow, Christopher Aaron
    Miller, Steven W.
    Wagner, Ulrich
    Kheradpour, Pouya
    Eaton, Matthew L.
    Loriaux, Paul
    Sealfon, Rachel
    Li, Zirong
    Ishii, Haruhiko
    Spokony, Rebecca F.
    Chen, Jia
    Hwang, Lindsay
    Cheng, Chao
    Auburn, Richard P.
    Davis, Melissa B.
    Domanus, Marc
    Shah, Parantu K.
    Morrison, Carolyn A.
    Zieba, Jennifer
    Suchy, Sarah
    Senderowicz, Lionel
    Victorsen, Alec
    Bild, Nicholas A.
    Grundstad, A. Jason
    Hanley, David
    MacAlpine, David M.
    Mannervik, Mattias
    Venken, Koen
    Bellen, Hugo
    White, Robert
    Gerstein, Mark
    Russell, Steven
    Grossman, Robert L.
    Ren, Bing
    Posakony, James W.
    Kellis, Manolis
    White, Kevin P.
    [J]. NATURE, 2011, 471 (7339) : 527 - 531
  • [6] A cis-regulatory map of the Drosophila genome
    Nicolas Nègre
    Christopher D. Brown
    Lijia Ma
    Christopher Aaron Bristow
    Steven W. Miller
    Ulrich Wagner
    Pouya Kheradpour
    Matthew L. Eaton
    Paul Loriaux
    Rachel Sealfon
    Zirong Li
    Haruhiko Ishii
    Rebecca F. Spokony
    Jia Chen
    Lindsay Hwang
    Chao Cheng
    Richard P. Auburn
    Melissa B. Davis
    Marc Domanus
    Parantu K. Shah
    Carolyn A. Morrison
    Jennifer Zieba
    Sarah Suchy
    Lionel Senderowicz
    Alec Victorsen
    Nicholas A. Bild
    A. Jason Grundstad
    David Hanley
    David M. MacAlpine
    Mattias Mannervik
    Koen Venken
    Hugo Bellen
    Robert White
    Mark Gerstein
    Steven Russell
    Robert L. Grossman
    Bing Ren
    James W. Posakony
    Manolis Kellis
    Kevin P. White
    [J]. Nature, 2011, 471 : 527 - 531
  • [7] Spatially varying cis-regulatory divergence in Drosophila embryos elucidates cis-regulatory logic
    Combs, Peter A.
    Fraser, Hunter B.
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2018, 14 (11):
  • [8] The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila
    Zandvakili, Arya
    Uhl, Juli D.
    Campbell, Ian
    Salomone, Joseph
    Song, Yuntao Charlie
    Gebelein, Brian
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 445 (02) : 226 - 236
  • [9] Logic functions of the genomic cis-regulatory code
    Davidson, E
    Istrail, S
    [J]. UNCONVENTIONAL COMPUTATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3699 : 19 - 19
  • [10] Cis-regulatory Variation Is Typically Polyallelic in Drosophila
    Gruber, Jonathan D.
    Long, Anthony D.
    [J]. GENETICS, 2009, 181 (02) : 661 - 670