Sensitization to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants and the ubiquitous protein profilin: mimickers of allergy

被引:138
|
作者
Ebo, DG [1 ]
Hagendorens, MM [1 ]
Bridts, CH [1 ]
De Clerck, LS [1 ]
Stevens, WJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Immunol Allergol & Rheumatol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY | 2004年 / 34卷 / 01期
关键词
carbohydrate determinants; cross-reactivity; food; hymenoptera venom; IgE; latex; profilin;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01837.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background During the last decade, evidence has been provided for profilins and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) to be capable of inducing cross-reactive IgE antibodies with little clinical relevance. Objective To investigate the prevalence of sensitization to CCD and profilin in isolated allergies (birch, timothy grass, house dust mite, pets (cat and/or dog), natural rubber latex (NRL) and hymenoptera venom). To study the contribution of anti-CCD and anti-profilin IgE antibodies as a cause of clinically irrelevant IgE for NRL and apple. Methods For the first part of the study, 100 patients with inhalant allergy, 17 patients with NRL allergy and 40 patients with venom anaphylaxis were enrolled. Diagnosis was based on a questionnaire and a positive IgE determination and skin test for relevant allergen. Patients were identified as sensitized to CCD if they had a negative prick test and positive IgE for the glycoprotein bromelain. Sensitization to profilin was assessed by IgE for rBet v 2 (recombinant birch profilin). For the second part of the study, sera containing IgE against apple (n=82) or NRL (n=38) were classified as true-negative or false-positive according to the presence or absence of an oral allergy syndrome (OAS) or NRL-induced anaphylaxis. In these patients, sensitization to CCD and profilin was evaluated as described above. Results No sensitization to bromelain-type CCD and profilin was found in isolated birch pollen or NRL allergy. In contrast, sensitization to bromelain-type CCD was found in 4/17 patients with isolated grass pollinosis, 5/24 patients with combined pollinosis (birch, timothy, mugwort) and 7/33 patients with venom anaphylaxis. Sensitization to profilin was almost restricted to patients with combined pollen allergy (5/24). In pollen-allergic individuals with a false-positive IgE against NRL the prevalence of sensitization to bromelain-type CCD and profilin IgE was higher than in NRL-allergic patients (P<0.00001 and P=0.0006, respectively). In pollen-allergic individuals with a false-positive IgE to apple, the frequency of sensitization to bromelain-type CCD was higher than in OAS patients (P=0.004). Clinically irrelevant NRL and apple were also found in four and five out of the seven patients sensitized to venom CCD, respectively. In pollinosis, clinically irrelevant NRL and apple IgE antibodies were inhibited by bromelain and recombinant birch profilin, whereas in isolated venom anaphylaxis these antibodies were inhibited by bromelain. Conclusions Patients monoallergic to NRL or birch pollen showed no sensitization to bromelain-type CCD or profilin. Sensitization to profilin and/or bromelain-type CCD, caused by pollen (timothy grass, mugwort) or hymenoptera venom allergens, can elicit false-positive IgE antibodies against NRL and apple.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 144
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Misleading Allergens in the Diagnosis of Latex Allergy: Profilin and Cross-Reactive Carbohydrate Determinants
    Gurlek, Feridun
    Unsel, Mehmet
    Ardeniz, Omur
    Koc, Zeynep Peker
    Gulbahar, Okan
    Sin, Aytul Zerrin
    Kokuludag, Ali
    Gokmen, Nihal Mete
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 176 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [2] Cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in the diagnosis of occupational allergy
    Wiszniewska, M.
    Zgorzelska-Kowalik, J.
    Palczynski, C.
    Nowakowska-Swirta, E.
    Walusiak-Skorupa, J.
    ALLERGY, 2011, 66 : 334 - 334
  • [3] Inhibition of Cross-Reactive Carbohydrate Determinants in Allergy Diagnostics
    Grzywnowicz, Maciej
    Majsiak, Emilia
    Gawel, Jozef
    Miskiewicz, Karolina
    Doniec, Zbigniew
    Kurzawa, Ryszard
    CLINICAL MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2018, 1116 : 75 - 79
  • [4] Coping with cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in allergy diagnosis
    Altmann F.
    Allergo Journal International, 2016, 25 (4) : 98 - 105
  • [5] CROSS-REACTIVE CARBOHYDRATE DETERMINANTS IN DIAGNOSTICS OF OCCUPATIONAL ALLERGY
    Zgorzelska-Kowalik, Joanna
    Wiszniewska, Marta
    Kowalik, Damian
    Krawczyk-Szulc, Patrycja
    Nowakowska-Swirta, Ewa
    Palczynski, Cezary
    Walusiak-Skorupa, Jolanta
    MEDYCYNA PRACY, 2010, 61 (01) : 79 - 89
  • [6] Coping with cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in allergy diagnosis
    Altmann, Friedrich
    ALLERGO JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (04) : 18 - 25
  • [7] Sensitization to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in 2 patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy and alcoholic cardiomyopathy
    Valcarcel, Maria-Angeles
    Vidal, Carmen
    Armisen, Margarita
    Rodriguez, Virginia
    Gonzalez-Quintela, Arturo
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 130 (04) : 1001 - 1003
  • [8] Impact of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants on wood dust sensitization
    Kespohl, S.
    Schlunssen, V.
    Jacobsen, G.
    Schaumburg, I.
    Maryska, S.
    Meurer, U.
    Bruening, T.
    Sigsgaard, T.
    Raulf-Heimsoth, M.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2010, 40 (07): : 1099 - 1106
  • [9] Sensitization to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in relation to alcohol consumption
    Gonzalez-Quintela, A.
    Garrido, M.
    Gude, F.
    Campos, J.
    Linneberg, A.
    Lojo, S.
    Vidal, C.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2008, 38 (01): : 152 - 160
  • [10] The significance of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCD) for allergy diagnosis
    Jappe, U.
    Raulf-Heimsoth, M.
    ALLERGOLOGIE, 2008, 31 (03) : 82 - 90