The Ethics of Welfare Provision for Migrants: A Case for Equal Treatment and the Repositioning of Welfare

被引:14
|
作者
Bolderson, Helen [1 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ, Dept Govt, London N6 6JP, England
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0047279410000899
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The paper examines the structure of selection that determines migrants' welfare rights. Using illustrations from the UK, it confirms that migrants' welfare rights are stratified by, and dependent on, immigration status. It describes the outcome of this structure and shows why welfare policies need to reclaim independence from immigration policies to which they have become tied. Using terms from Walzer (1983), an argument is made for 'autonomy' in these different 'spheres'. An alternative approach is suggested in which access to welfare provisions for migrants is made regardless of immigration status and is based instead on equal treatment and nondiscrimination between migrants and nationals of the receiving country. Nationals are seen to be migrants' comparators, and unequal treatment between them constitutes discrimination. Alternative approaches to migrants' welfare include reliance on universal international human rights law, and approaches that take into account more radical, substantive equality values than equal treatment. We argue, however, that amongst the advantages of an equal treatment policy are the rights retained by national governments to exercise sovereignty in determining the shape of their welfare provisions whilst also engaging international law on human rights.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 235
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条