Comparison of conventional and digital radiography for radiometric differentiation of dental cements

被引:0
|
作者
Baksi, B. Gueniz
Ermis, R. Banu
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Diag & Radiol, Bornova, Turkey
[2] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent & Endodont, Isparra, Turkey
来源
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL | 2007年 / 38卷 / 09期
关键词
computer-assisted densitometry; dental cements; dental radiography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To test the efficacy of conventional radiometry with indirect digital image analysis in the assessment of the relative radiopacity of dental cements used as liners or bases compared to human enamel and dentin. Method and Materials, Disks of 15 different dental cements, 5 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were exposed to radiation together with 2-mm-thick disks of enamel and dentin and an aluminum step wedge. Density was evalulated by digital transmission densitometry and with the histogram function of an image analysis program following digitization of the radiographs with a flatbed scanner. Results: A higher number of dental cements were discriminated from both dentin and enamel with conventional radiographic densitometer. All the cements examined, except lonoseal (Voco) and lonobond (Voco), were more radiopaque than dentin. With both methods, Chelon-Silver (3M ESPE) had the highest radiopacity and glass-ionomer cements the lowest. Conclusion: Radiodensity of dental cements can be differentiated with a high probability with the conventional radiometric method.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography
    An, Seo-Young
    An, Chang-Hyeon
    Choi, Karp-Sik
    Huh, Kyung-Hoe
    Yi, Won-Jin
    Heo, Min-Suk
    Lee, Sam-Sun
    Choi, Soon-Chul
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2018, 48 (02) : 97 - 101
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL FILM SCREEN RADIOGRAPHY
    KALENDER, WA
    HUBENER, KH
    FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NUKLEARMEDIZIN, 1984, 140 (01): : 87 - 92
  • [3] COMPARISON OF ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPHY WITH CONVENTIONAL PERIAPICAL DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY
    OHBA, T
    KATAYAMA, H
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1972, 34 (03): : 524 - &
  • [5] Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions - Overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography
    Kullendorff, B
    Nilsson, M
    Rohlin, M
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1996, 82 (03): : 344 - 350
  • [6] COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY WITH TRADITIONAL DENTAL FILM
    HUNSAKER, KJ
    PALMER, TM
    ROBERTSON, GM
    CHRISTENSEN, RP
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 143 - 143
  • [7] Comparison of conventional and digital radiography in lizards. Mammography technique versus digital radiography
    Bochmann, M.
    Ludewig, E.
    Pees, M.
    TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE KLEINTIERE HEIMTIERE, 2011, 39 (04): : 259 - 267
  • [8] Root fracture detection: a comparison of direct digital radiography with conventional radiography
    Kositbowornchai, S
    Nuansakul, R
    Sikram, S
    Sinahawattana, S
    Saengmontri, S
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (02) : 106 - 109
  • [9] EFFICACY OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF PNEUMOTHORAX - COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY
    ELAM, EA
    REHM, K
    HILLMAN, BJ
    MALONEY, K
    FAJARDO, LL
    MCNEILL, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (03) : 509 - 514
  • [10] Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging
    Bansal, G. J.
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 82 (969) : 425 - 428