Computer Reminders for Chlamydia Screening in General Practice: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:33
|
作者
Walker, Jennifer [1 ]
Fairley, Christopher K. [1 ]
Walker, Sandra M. [1 ]
Gurrin, Lyle C. [2 ]
Gunn, Jane M. [3 ]
Pirotta, Marie V. [3 ]
Carter, Rob [4 ,5 ]
Hocking, Jane S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Populat Hlth, Sexual Hlth Unit, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Populat Hlth, Ctr Mol Environm Genet & Analyt Epidemiol, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Gen Practice, Primary Care Res Unit, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sch Populat Hlth, Program Evaluat Unit, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Burwood, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Sch Populat Hlth, Ctr Womens Hlth Gender & Soc, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
INFECTIONS; AUSTRALIA; ENGLAND; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181cfcb4c
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Chlamydia notifications are increasing in Australia, and the use of a computer alert prompting general practitioners to test young women is a potential way to increase opportunistic chlamydia testing. The aim of this trial was to determine the effectiveness of a computer alert in general practice on chlamydia testing in young women. Methods: In 2006, clinics (n = 68) in Melbourne, Australia were cluster randomized into 2 groups: the intervention group received a computerized alert advising the general practitioner to discuss chlamydia testing with their patient which popped up when the medical record of a 16- to 24-year-old woman was opened; the control group received no alert. The outcome was whether or not that patient received a chlamydia test at the level of a single consultation with an eligible patient. A mixed effects logistic regression model adjusting for clustering was used to assess the impact of the alert on the proportion of women tested for chlamydia during the trial period. Results: Testing increased from 8.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.8, 9.8) to 12.2% (95% CI: 9.1, 15.3) (P < 0.01) in the intervention group, and from 8.8% (95% CI: 6.8, 10.7) to 10.6% (95% CI: 8.5, 12.7) (P < 0.01) in the control group. Overall, the intervention group had a 27% (OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) greater increase in testing. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that alerts alone may not be sufficient to get chlamydia testing levels up sufficiently high enough to have an impact on the burden of chlamydia in the population but that they could be included as part of a more complex intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 450
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPUTER REMINDERS FOR CHLAMYDIA SCREENING IN GENERAL PRACTICE: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Walker, J.
    Walker, S.
    Fairley, C. K.
    Gunn, J.
    Pirotta, M.
    Gurrin, L.
    Carter, R.
    Hocking, J.
    [J]. SEXUAL HEALTH, 2009, 6 (04) : 363 - 363
  • [2] The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
    Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard
    Volkert Siersma
    Susanne Reventlow
    Ruth Ertmann
    Peter Felding
    Frans Boch Waldorff
    [J]. Implementation Science, 8
  • [3] IMPACT OF A SCREENING PROGRAMME IN GENERAL PRACTICE - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    BENNETT, AE
    FRASER, IGP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1972, 1 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [4] The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice-a randomized controlled trial
    Kousgaard, Marius Brostrom
    Siersma, Volkert
    Reventlow, Susanne
    Ertmann, Ruth
    Felding, Peter
    Waldorff, Frans Boch
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8
  • [5] Patient and Physician Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sequist, Thomas D.
    Zaslavsky, Alan M.
    Marshall, Richard
    Fletcher, Robert H.
    Ayanian, John Z.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (04) : 364 - 371
  • [6] Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis at the time of routine Pap smear in general practice:: a cluster randomised controlled trial
    Bowden, Francis J.
    Currie, Marian J.
    Toyne, Helen
    McGuiness, Clare
    Lim, Lynette L.
    Butler, James R.
    Glasgow, Nicholas J.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2008, 188 (02) : 76 - 80
  • [7] GP INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR THE OPPORTUNISTIC SCREENING OF YOUNG WOMEN FOR CHLAMYDIA IN GENERAL PRACTICE - A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Bilardi, J. E.
    Fairley, C. K.
    Temple-Smith, M.
    Pirotta, M.
    McNamee, K.
    Bourke, S.
    Gurrin, L.
    Hellard, M.
    Sanci, L.
    Wills, M.
    Chen, M. Y.
    Hocking, J. S.
    [J]. SEXUAL HEALTH, 2009, 6 (04) : 364 - 364
  • [8] PSYCHIATRIC SCREENING IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - CONTROLLED TRIAL
    JOHNSTONE, A
    GOLDBERG, D
    [J]. LANCET, 1976, 1 (7960): : 605 - 608
  • [9] A randomised controlled trial of SMS reminders for routine asthma care in an Australian general practice
    Mitchell, Benjamin L.
    Carter, John
    Mitchell, Amy E.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 48 (09) : 626 - 630
  • [10] Patients and computers as reminders to screen for diabetes in family practice - Randomized-controlled trial
    Kenealy, T
    Arroll, B
    Petrie, KJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (10) : 916 - 921