High vs. low intensity courses. Student Technological Behavior

被引:2
|
作者
Redondo, Ernest [1 ]
Gimenez, Lluis [1 ]
Valls, Francesc [1 ]
Navarro, Isidro [2 ]
Fonseca, David [2 ]
Villagrasa, Sergi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, BarcelonaTech, ETSAB, Barcelona, Spain
[2] La Salle Univ Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Technological skills assessment; user experience; student motivation; mixed methods assessment; student behavior; AUGMENTED REALITY; SPATIAL SKILLS; STEREO; MOBILE; ICT;
D O I
10.1145/2808580.2808593
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the design of two educational proposals centered on Project-Based Learning (PBL) and the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Both courses are focused on the spatial representation of 3D models in architectural training. The object of study focuses on comparing the students' competence and motivation in two different educational scenarios: a low-density experience where 3-4 software applications are used and a high density "crash course" using about 15 different applications and techniques. For the analysis of the results of this phase, a quantitative approach was designed to compare both groups and review the students' motivation and pre-course competence. The results obtained show that the two groups had similar technological profiles that supports the realization of both proposals and comparison of results. However, assessing the different degrees of initial motivation between the two groups, entails that, in the final examination of the proposal, the results must be cross-checked.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 82
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Distance learning in chemistry at RIT, part 2: Assessment of distance learning vs. regular courses.
    Paine, RH
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 218 : U252 - U252
  • [3] A COMPARISON OF HIGH INTENSITY VS. LOW INTENSITY EXERCISE ON BODY COMPOSITION IN OVERWEIGHT WOMEN
    King, J.
    Panton, L.
    Broeder, C.
    Browder, K.
    Quindry, J.
    Rhea, L.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2001, 33 (05): : S228 - S228
  • [4] Success of Achieving Student Learning Objectives: Compressed vs. Traditional Courses
    Miller, Irene
    Bliss, Timm
    [J]. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 2024, 11 (02): : 1 - 21
  • [5] AND NEVER THE TWO SHALL MEET?: STUDENT VS. FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE COURSES
    Osborne, Randall E.
    Kriese, Paul
    Tobey, Heather
    Johnson, Emily
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2009, 40 (02) : 171 - 182
  • [6] Low Vs. High Alcohol: Central Benefits Vs. Detriments
    Yousef Tizabi
    Bruk Getachew
    Clifford L. Ferguson
    Antonei B. Csoka
    Karl M. Thompson
    Alejandra Gomez-Paz
    Jana Ruda-Kucerova
    Robert E. Taylor
    [J]. Neurotoxicity Research, 2018, 34 : 860 - 869
  • [7] Low Vs. High Alcohol: Central Benefits Vs. Detriments
    Tizabi, Yousef
    Getachew, Bruk
    Ferguson, Clifford L.
    Csoka, Antonei B.
    Thompson, Karl M.
    Gomez-Paz, Alejandra
    Ruda-Kucerova, Jana
    Taylor, Robert E.
    [J]. NEUROTOXICITY RESEARCH, 2018, 34 (04) : 860 - 869
  • [8] POPULAR HEROIC MEMORY VS. LOW INTENSITY WAR
    Gaitan, Gloria
    [J]. CIUDAD PAZ-ANDO, 2012, 5 (02) : 89 - 104
  • [9] ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING IN COURSES TAUGHT BY COURSE AUTHORS VS. OTHER QUALIFIED INSTRUCTORS
    Castle, S.
    Marron, J.
    Hopkins, T.
    [J]. INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 163 - 171
  • [10] ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING IN COURSES TAUGHT BY COURSE AUTHORS VS. OTHER QUALIFIED INSTRUCTORS
    Castle, S.
    Marron, J.
    Hopkins, T.
    [J]. ICERI2015: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2015, : 4552 - 4558