The Effect of State Policies on Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United States

被引:44
|
作者
Chatterjee, Paula [1 ,2 ]
Venkataramani, Atheendar S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Vijayan, Anitha [5 ]
Wellen, Jason R. [6 ]
Martin, Erika G. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Global Hlth, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Renal Dis, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[6] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sect Transplantat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[7] SUNY Albany, Nelson A Rockefeller Inst Govt, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[8] SUNY Albany, Rockefeller Coll Publ Affairs & Policy, Dept Publ Adm & Policy, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
LIVING KIDNEY DONATION; DONOR ORGANS; INCREASE; LEGISLATION; REGISTRY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2194
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Shortages in transplantable solid organs remain a critical public health challenge in the United States. During the past 2 decades, all states have implemented policies to increase organ supply, although their effectiveness is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the effects on organ donation and transplantation rates of state policies to provide incentives for volunteer donation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Using a quasi-experimental design and difference-in-differences regression analyses, we estimated the effect of policies in all 50 states and the District of Columbia on organ donors per capita and the number of transplantations from January 1, 1988, to December 31, 2010. Analyses were also stratified by type of donor (living vs deceased). Data were derived from the United Network for Organ Sharing. All data collection occurred between July 7 and September 27, 2013. EXPOSURES Policies of interest were the presence of first-person consent laws, donor registries, dedicated revenue streams for donor recruitment activities, population education programs, paid leave for donation, and tax incentives. Information on states' passage of various policies was obtained from primary legislative and legal sources. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The number of organ donors and transplantations per state, per year, during the study period. RESULTS From 1988 to 2010, the number of states passing at least 1 donation-related policy increased from 7 (14%) to 50 (100%). First-person consent laws, donor registries, public education, paid leave, and tax incentives had no robust, significant association with either donation rates or number of transplants. The establishment of revenue policies, in which individuals contribute to a protected state fund for donation promotion activities, was associated with a 5.3% increase in the absolute number of transplants (95% CI, 0.57%-10.1%; P =.03). These associations were driven by a 4.9% increase in organ donations (95% CI, 0.97%-8.7%; P =.01) and an 8.0% increase in transplants (95% CI, 3.1%-12.9%; P =.001) from deceased donors as opposed to changes among living donors or transplants from living donors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Nearly all state-level policies to encourage organ donation have had no observable effect on the rate of organ donation and transplantation in the United States. The one exception was the establishment of revenue policies to promote organ donation, which may have led to small increases in organ donations and transplantations from deceased donors. New policy designs are needed to increase donation rates and curtail the widening gap between organ supply and demand.
引用
收藏
页码:1323 / 1329
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of State Policies on Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United States
    Wellen, Jason
    Chatterjee, Paula
    Venkataramani, Atheendar
    Vijayan, Anitha
    Martin, Erika
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15 : 50 - 50
  • [2] Organ donation and transplantation trends in the United States, 2001
    Port, FK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 : 7 - 12
  • [3] Little effect of state policies on organ donation in the USA
    Arthur J. Matas
    Rebecca E. Hays
    [J]. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 2015, 11 : 570 - 572
  • [4] Little effect of state policies on organ donation in the USA
    Matas, Arthur J.
    Hays, Rebecca E.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 11 (10) : 570 - 572
  • [5] Trends and results for organ donation and transplantation in the United States, 2004
    Port, FK
    Dykstra, DM
    Merion, RM
    Wolfe, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (04) : 843 - 849
  • [6] Homelessness, organ donation, transplantation, and a call for equity in the United States
    Warman, Ashley
    Sparber, Lauren
    Molmenti, Alexia Hebe
    Molmenti, Ernesto P.
    [J]. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS, 2023, 22
  • [7] Organ donation in the United States
    Nathan, HM
    Conrad, SL
    Held, PJ
    McCullough, KP
    Pietroski, RE
    Siminoff, LA
    Ojo, AO
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 : 29 - 40
  • [8] The Current Opaque State of Organ Donation Metrics in the United States
    Gerber, David A.
    Chapman, William C.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (02) : 180 - 180
  • [9] Trends in Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United States, 1998-2007
    Wolfe, R. A.
    Merion, R. M.
    Roys, E. C.
    Port, F. K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 (04) : 869 - 878
  • [10] Trends in organ donation and transplantation in the United States, 1996-2005
    Port, F. K.
    Merion, R. M.
    Finley, M. P.
    Goodrich, N. P.
    Wolfe, R. A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (05) : 1319 - 1326