Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment

被引：330
|
作者：
Carlsson, F
Martinsson, P
机构：
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Econ, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Lund, Dept Econ, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
来源：
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT | 2001年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词：
choice experiments; external validity; internal validity; hypothetical and actual marginal WTP; public goods;
D O I：
10.1006/jeem.2000.1138
中图分类号：
F [经济];
学科分类号：
02 ;
摘要：
In this paper we test the validity of choice experiments with donations far environmental projects. In particular, we test whether or not there are differences in preferences between a hypothetical and an actual choice experiment: our experiments indicate no differences. In addition, internal tests of validity indicate transitive and stable preferences in both experiments, although there are some indications of possible learning effects during the experiment. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码：179 / 192
页数：14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay
    Hensher, David A.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2010, 44 (06) : 735 - 752
  • [2] Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: Results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay
    Loomis, J
    Brown, T
    Lucero, B
    Peterson, G
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (04) : 450 - 461
  • [3] Validity of willingness to pay: hypothetical versus actual payment
    Bhatia, MR
    Fox-Rushby, JA
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 10 (12) : 737 - 740
  • [4] The marginal willingness-to-pay for attributes of a hypothetical HIV vaccine
    Cameron, Michael P.
    Newman, Peter A.
    Roungprakhon, Surachet
    Scarpa, Riccardo
    [J]. VACCINE, 2013, 31 (36) : 3712 - 3717
  • [5] HEDONIC VALUATION OF MARGINAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
    Saptutyningsih, Endah
    Basuki, Agus Tri
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2012, 4 (02) : 163 - 172
  • [6] Do divergences between stated and actual willingness to pay signify the existence of bias in contingent valuation surveys?
    Onwujekwe, O
    Hanson, K
    Fox-Rushby, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (03) : 525 - 536
  • [7] Addressing Negative Willingness to Pay in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation
    Alok K. Bohara
    Joe Kerkvliet
    Robert P. Berrens
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 20 : 173 - 195
  • [8] Addressing negative willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Bohara, AK
    Kerkvliet, J
    Berrens, RP
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (03): : 173 - 195
  • [9] Investigating Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Asymmetry in Choice Experiments
    Lanz, Bruno
    Provins, Allan
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Scarpa, Riccardo
    Willis, Ken
    Ozdemiroglu, Ece
    [J]. CHOICE MODELLING: THE STATE-OF-THE-ART AND THE STATE-OF-PRACTICE, 2010, : 517 - 541
  • [10] Scope Elasticity of Willingness to pay in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Dugstad, Anders
    Grimsrud, Kristine M.
    Kipperberg, Gorm
    Lindhjem, Henrik
    Navrud, Stale
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2021, 80 (01): : 21 - 57
12345