Treatment Mode Preferences in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Qualitative Multi-Country Study

被引:12
|
作者
Aletaha, Daniel [1 ]
Husni, M. Elaine [2 ]
Merola, Joseph F. [3 ]
Ranza, Roberto [4 ]
Bertheussen, Heidi [5 ]
Lippe, Ralph [6 ]
Young, Pamela M. [7 ]
Cappelleri, Joseph C. [8 ]
Brown, T. Michelle [9 ]
Ervin, Claire [9 ]
Hsu, Ming-Ann [10 ]
Fallon, Lara [11 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Internal Med 3, Div Rheumatol, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Rheumat & Immunol Dis, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Serv Reumatol, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[5] Patient Representat, Oslo, Norway
[6] Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Inflammat & Immunol, Berlin, Germany
[7] Pfizer Inc, Inflammat & Immunol, Collegeville, PA USA
[8] Pfizer Inc, Stat, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[9] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[10] Pfizer Inc, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[11] Pfizer Inc, Med Affairs, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
关键词
psoriatic arthritis; patient preference; qualitative research; treatment administration; PATIENT PREFERENCES; THERAPIES; RECOMMENDATIONS; CARE;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S242336
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Qualitative research exploring patient preferences regarding the mode of treatment administration for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is limited. We report patient preferences and their reasons across PsA treatment modes. Methods: In this global, cross-sectional, qualitative study, interviews were conducted with adult patients with PsA in Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, and the US. Patients were currently taking a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Patients indicated the order and strength of preference (0-100; 100 = strongest) across four modes of treatment administration: oral (once daily), self-injection (weekly), clinic injection (weekly), and infusion (monthly); reasons for preferences were qualitatively assessed. Descriptive statistics were reported. Fisher's exact tests and t-tests were conducted for treatment mode outcomes. Results: Overall, 85 patients were interviewed (female, 60.0%; mean age, 49.8 years). First-choice ranking (%) and mean [standard deviation] preference points were: oral (49.4%; 43.9 [31.9]); self-injection (34.1%; 32.4 [24.8]); infusion (15.3%; 14.5 [20.0]); clinic injection (1.2%; 9.2 [10.0]). Of 48 (56.5%) patients with a strong first-choice preference (ie point allocation >= 60), 66.7% chose oral administration. Self-injection was most often selected as second choice (51.8%), clinic injection as third (49.4%), and infusion as fourth (47.1%). Oral administration was the first-choice preference in the US (88.0% vs 38.0% in Europe). The most commonly reported reason for oral administration as the first choice was speed and ease of administration (76.2%); for self-injection, this was convenience (75.9%). The most commonly reported reason for avoiding oral administration was concern about possible drug interactions (63.6%); for self-injection, this was a dislike of needles or the injection process (66.7%). Conclusion: Patients with PsA preferred oral treatment administration, followed by self-injection; convenience factors were common reasons for these preferences. Overall, 43.5% of patients did not feel strongly about their first-choice preference and may benefit from discussions with healthcare professionals about PsA treatment administration options.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 961
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bottlenecks to HIV care and treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country qualitative study
    Wringe, Alison
    Renju, Jenny
    Seeley, Janet
    Moshabela, Mosa
    Skovdal, Morten
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2017, 93
  • [2] Taxonomy of the burden of treatment: a multi-country web-based qualitative study of patients with chronic conditions
    Tran, Viet-Thi
    Barnes, Caroline
    Montori, Victor M.
    Falissard, Bruno
    Ravaud, Philippe
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2015, 13
  • [3] Taxonomy of the burden of treatment: a multi-country web-based qualitative study of patients with chronic conditions
    Viet-Thi Tran
    Caroline Barnes
    Victor M. Montori
    Bruno Falissard
    Philippe Ravaud
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 13
  • [4] SMOLDERING MULTIPLE MYELOMA: A MULTI-COUNTRY MIXED-METHODS STUDY ON DISEASE PERCEPTIONS AND PATIENT TREATMENT PREFERENCES
    Quaife, M.
    Jimenez-Moreno, C.
    Gros, Otero B.
    Asra, A.
    Gupta-Werner, N.
    Gries, K. S.
    Leisten, M. K.
    Matt, K.
    Carson, R.
    Dennis, R.
    He, J.
    Levitan, B.
    Bathija, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S322 - S322
  • [5] Multi-country stated preferences choice analysis for fresh tomatoes
    De Salvo, Maria
    Scarpa, Riccardo
    Capitello, Roberta
    Begalli, Diego
    [J]. BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 9 (03): : 241 - 262
  • [6] A Multi-Country Comparison of Consumers' Preferences for Imported Fruits and Vegetables
    Yang, Shang-Ho
    Panjaitan, Bella Pebriyani
    [J]. HORTICULTURAE, 2021, 7 (12)
  • [7] The association of self-blame with treatment preferences in a multi-country cohort of advanced cancer patients from the APPROACH study
    Doble, Brett
    Lau, Eden
    Malhotra, Chetna
    Ozdemir, Semra
    Teo, Irene
    Finkelstein, Eric A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2020, 139
  • [8] Exploring the burden of X-linked hypophosphatemia: a European multi-country qualitative study
    Lo, S. H.
    Lachmann, R.
    Williams, A.
    Piglowska, N.
    Lloyd, A. J.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (07) : 1883 - 1893
  • [9] Data and information needs of policymakers for palliative cancer care: a multi-country qualitative study
    Eve Namisango
    Lauren Ramsey
    Adlight Dandadzi
    Kehinde Okunade
    Bassey Ebenso
    Matthew J. Allsop
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21
  • [10] TREATMENT AND OUTCOMES IN GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME: A MULTI-COUNTRY CHART REVIEW STUDY
    Shillington, A.
    Macahilig, C.
    Shaw, J.
    Dastani, H.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 : 32 - 32