Knowledge co-production in the Helge a catchment: a comparative analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Malmborg, Katja [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wallin, Ida [4 ,5 ]
Brukas, Vilis [5 ]
Do, Thao [6 ]
Lodin, Isak [5 ,7 ]
Neset, Tina-Simone [8 ]
Norstrom, Albert, V [1 ,9 ]
Powell, Neil [6 ,10 ]
Tonderski, Karin [11 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Biol Sci, Bergen, Norway
[3] Univ Bergen, Ctr Sustainable Area Management CeSAM, Bergen, Norway
[4] Univ Freiburg, Chair Forest & Environm Policy, Freiburg, Germany
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Southern Swedish Forest Res Ctr, Alnarp, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Sustainabil Learning & Res Ctr, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] WWF Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Climate Sci & Policy Res, Dept Themat Studies Environm Change, Linkoping, Sweden
[9] Stockholm Univ, Global Resilience Partnership, Stockholm, Sweden
[10] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sustainabil Res Ctr, Sippy Downs, Qld, Australia
[11] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Environm Technol & Management, Linkoping, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Berta Martin-Lopez; Futures methods; ecosystem services; landscape management; participatory methods; process evaluation; transdisciplinarity; TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PARTICIPATION; GOVERNANCE; SCIENCE; POLICY; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1080/26395916.2022.2125583
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Addressing sustainability challenges in landscape management requires processes for co-producing usable knowledge together with those who will use that knowledge. Participatory futures methods are powerful tools for attaining such knowledge. The applications of such methods are diverse and understanding the intricacies of the knowledge co-production process is important to further develop these research practices. To improve participatory futures methods and contribute to systematic and critical reflections on methodology, we present a comparative analysis of four research projects that applied participatory futures methods in the same study area. Conducted between 2011 and 2020, these projects aimed to co-produce knowledge about the future provision of ecosystem services in the Helge a catchment area in southern Sweden. For structuring the post-hoc, self-reflexive analysis, we developed a framework dividing the knowledge co-production process into three dimensions: settings, synthesis and diffusion. We based the analysis on documentation from the projects, a two-step questionnaire to each research team, a workshop with co-authors and interviews with key participants. The comparison highlights steps in project decision-making, explicit and implicit assumptions in our respective approaches and how these assumptions informed process design in the projects. Our detailed description of the four knowledge co-production processes points to the importance of flexibility in research design, but also the necessity for researchers and other participants to adapt as the process unfolds.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 582
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services
    Khine, Pwint Kay
    Mi, Jianing
    Shahid, Raza
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [2] Ethics and the co-production of knowledge
    Page, Katie
    PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (02):
  • [3] Co-production of knowledge in the integrality
    Montes, Cecilia
    PSICOLOGIA CONOCIMIENTO Y SOCIEDAD, 2015, 5 (02): : 414 - 429
  • [4] Co-production of knowledge: the future
    Redman, S.
    Greenhalgh, T.
    Adedokun, L.
    Staniszewska, S.
    Denegri, S.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [5] Negotiating space for knowledge co-production
    Verwoerd, Lisa
    Brouwers, Hilde
    Kunseler, Eva
    Regeer, Barbara
    de Hoop, Evelien
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 50 (01) : 59 - 71
  • [6] The co-production of knowledge for climate science
    Miner, Kimberley
    Canavera, Leslie
    Gonet, Jared
    Luis, Kelly
    Maddox, Marisol
    McCarney, Paul
    Bridge, Gwen
    Schimel, David
    Rattlingleaf, James
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 13 (04) : 307 - 308
  • [7] The co-production of knowledge for climate science
    Kimberley Miner
    Leslie Canavera
    Jared Gonet
    Kelly Luis
    Marisol Maddox
    Paul McCarney
    Gwen Bridge
    David Schimel
    James Rattlingleaf
    Nature Climate Change, 2023, 13 : 307 - 308
  • [8] Introduction: participatory knowledge co-production
    Carrera, Jennifer
    Levidow, Les
    SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2025, 34 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [9] The limits of co-production: linking regulatory capacity to co-production of authoritative knowledge for environmental policy
    Large, Daniel
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2024,
  • [10] Conversation Analysis and Early Childhood Education: The Co-Production of Knowledge and Relationships
    Theobald, Maryanne
    SYMBOLIC INTERACTION, 2018, 41 (01) : 132 - 134