Large-scale flash flood warning in China using deep learning

被引:12
|
作者
Zhao, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Ronghua [3 ]
Yang, Mingxiang [3 ]
Tu, Tongbi [4 ]
Ma, Meihong [5 ]
Hong, Yang [6 ]
Wang, Xiekang [7 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Inst Water Resources, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol BS8 1QU, Avon, England
[3] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Guangzhou 519082, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Tianjin Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Civil Engn & Environm Sci, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[7] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul & Mt River Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flash flood warning; Deep learning; Mountainous and hilly areas; China; MOUNTAINOUS AREAS; RAINFALL THRESHOLD; DEBRIS FLOWS; METHODOLOGY; RESOLUTION; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127222
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Flash flood warning (FFW) systems play a fundamental role in flood hazard prevention and mitigation. In this study, we propose the first deep learning-based approach for large-scale FFW and demonstrate the application of this approach to mountainous and hilly areas of China. Specifically, the time series of precipitation before flash floods and three spatial features (maximum daily precipitation, curve number, and slope) are selected as predictors. A long short-term memory (LSTM)-based approach is adopted to predict the occurrence of flash floods, and we compare this approach with two widely used FFW methods, namely the rainfall triggering index (RTI) and flash flood guidance (FFG). The results demonstrate the following: (1) The LSTM-based approach provided a reliable FFW 1 day ahead with a hit rate (HR) of 0.84 and false alarm rate (FAR) of 0.09. It demonstrated moderate warning performance 2 days before flash floods, with an HR of 0.66 and FAR of 0.21. (2) The LSTMbased approach outperformed the benchmark RTI and FFG methods, achieving the highest critical success index (CSI) of 0.77. The FFG also provided satisfactory performance, with a CSI of 0.71, and the RTI demonstrated the lowest performance (CSI = 0.68). (3) The LSTM-based approach provides better results (CSI = 0.75) than RTI (CSI = 0.68) when only the time series of precipitation is used for prediction. The performance of the LSTMbased approach can be improved by considering the spatial features and a long time series of precipitation during model development. (4) The proposed approach did not exacerbate the effect of precipitation uncertainty on the flash flood warning; and we suggest using ensemble results for FFW to reduce the uncertainty caused by small or unbalanced learning samples. We conclude that the proposed approach is a valid method for large-scale FFW without using commercially sensitive observations, and can improve the capabilities of flood disaster mitigation, particularly in ungauged areas.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flash flood early warning research in China
    Li, Haichen
    Lei, Xiaohui
    Shang, Yizi
    Qin, Tao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 34 (03) : 369 - 385
  • [2] Novel time-lag informed deep learning framework for enhanced streamflow prediction and flood early warning in large-scale catchments
    Ma, Kai
    He, Daming
    Liu, Shiyin
    Ji, Xuan
    Li, Yungang
    Jiang, Huiru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 631
  • [3] Large-scale Deep Learning at Baidu
    Yu, Kai
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (CIKM'13), 2013, : 2211 - 2211
  • [4] Moisture Sources and Large-Scale Dynamics Associated With a Flash Flood Event
    Liberato, Margarida L. R.
    Ramos, Alexandre M.
    Trigo, Ricardo M.
    Trigo, Isabel F.
    Maria Duran-Quesada, Ana
    Nieto, Raquel
    Gimeno, Luis
    [J]. LAGRANGIAN MODELING OF THE ATMOSPHERE, 2012, 200 : 111 - +
  • [5] Large-Scale Mobile App Identification Using Deep Learning
    Rezaei, Shahbaz
    Kroencke, Bryce
    Liu, Xin
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 348 - 362
  • [6] Rich Punctuations Prediction Using Large-scale Deep Learning
    Wu, Xueyang
    Zhu, Su
    Wu, Yue
    Yu, Kai
    [J]. 2016 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CHINESE SPOKEN LANGUAGE PROCESSING (ISCSLP), 2016,
  • [7] Large-scale transport simulation by deep learning
    Jie Pan
    [J]. Nature Computational Science, 2021, 1 : 306 - 306
  • [8] Tractable large-scale deep reinforcement learning
    Sarang, Nima
    Poullis, Charalambos
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2023, 232
  • [9] Large-scale transport simulation by deep learning
    Pan, Jie
    [J]. NATURE COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 1 (05): : 306 - 306
  • [10] The three pillars of large-scale deep learning
    Hoefler, Torsten
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM WORKSHOPS (IPDPSW), 2021, : 908 - 908