Hybrid reliability model for nuclear reactor safety system

被引:30
|
作者
Verlinden, Steven [1 ]
Deconinck, Geert [2 ]
Coupe, Bernard [1 ]
机构
[1] CEN SCK, Belgian Nucl Res Ctr, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Elect Engn ESAT, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
关键词
Hybrid reliability model; Markov process; Reliability block diagram; Shutdown system; Belgian reactor 2; DYNAMIC FAULT-TREE; OPTIMIZATION; MAINTENANCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2012.01.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The dependability of critical safety systems needs to be quantitatively determined in order to verify their effectiveness, e.g. with regard to regulatory requirements. Since modular redundant safety systems are not required for normal operation, their reliability is strongly dependent on periodic inspection. Several modeling methods for the quantitative assessment of dependability are described in the literature, with a broad variation in complexity and modeling power. Static modeling techniques such as fault tree analysis (ETA) or reliability block diagrams (RBD) are not capable of capturing redundancy and repair or test activities. Dynamic state space based models such as continuous time Markov chains (CTMC) are more powerful but often result in very large, intractable models. Moreover, exponentially distributed state residence times are not a correct representation of actual residence times associated with repair activities or periodic inspection. In this study, a hybrid model combines a system level RBD with a CTMC to describe the dynamics. The effects of periodic testing are modeled by redistributing state probabilities at deterministic test times. Applying the method to the primary safety shutdown system of the BR2(Belgian Reactor 2) nuclear research reactor, resulted in a quantitative as well as a qualitative assessment of its reliability. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 47
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NUCLEAR-REACTOR CONTAINMENT SAFETY SYSTEM RELIABILITY
    PUTTRE, PG
    [J]. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1974, 96 (04): : 70 - 70
  • [2] A Hybrid Machine Learning Model for Reliability Evaluation of the Reactor Protection System
    Shouman, Marwa A.
    Saber, Amany S.
    Shaat, Mohamed K.
    El-Sayed, Ayman
    Torkey, Hanaa
    [J]. ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 61 (09) : 6797 - 6809
  • [3] Quality Assurance in Sustaining Reliability of Nuclear Reactor Safety Systems
    Mishra, Vivek
    Varde, P. V.
    [J]. RELIABILITY, SAFETY AND HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR RISK-BASED TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, : 627 - 637
  • [4] RELIABILITY ESTIMATES AND REACTOR-SAFETY-SYSTEM OPERATION
    SCOTT, RL
    [J]. NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1967, 8 (05): : 479 - &
  • [5] OBJECTIVES OF NUCLEAR SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND SAFETY STUDIES
    PENLAND, JR
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1976, 25 (03) : 147 - 150
  • [6] Application of reactor noise methods in safety and reliability of nuclear power plants
    Kostic, L
    [J]. PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, : 680 - 688
  • [7] SYSTEM RELIABILITY - AN EXAMPLE OF NUCLEAR-REACTOR SYSTEM-ANALYSIS
    COUDRAY, R
    MATTEI, JM
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1984, 7 (02) : 89 - 121
  • [8] A hybrid approach to quantify software reliability in nuclear safety systems
    Babu, P. Arun
    Kumar, C. Senthil
    Murali, N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2012, 50 : 133 - 140
  • [9] SPACE REACTOR POWER-SYSTEM NUCLEAR SAFETY
    BROWN, NW
    DAMON, DR
    SMITH, MA
    TEMME, MI
    [J]. NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1990, 31 (04): : 460 - 476
  • [10] A reliability model for safety instrumented system
    Ouache, Rachid
    Kabir, Muhammad Nomani
    Adham, Ali A. J.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 80 : 264 - 273