Carbon prices and CCS investment: A comparative study between the European Union and China

被引:44
|
作者
Renner, Marie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] EconomiX, Paris Ouest Nanterre Def, France
[2] EDF R&D, Clamart, France
[3] Palais Brongniart, Climate Econ Chair, F-75002 Paris, France
关键词
Carbon capture and storage; Power sector; CO2; price; Investment choice; European Union; China; POWER-PLANTS; COST; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.026
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Carbon Capture and Storage is considered as a key option for climate change mitigation; policy makers and investors need to know when CCS becomes economically attractive. Integrating CCS in a power plant adds significant costs which can be offset by a sufficient CO2 price. However, most markets have failed: currently, the weak carbon price threatens CCS deployment in the European Union (EU). In China, a carbon regulation is appearing and CCS encounters a rising interest. This study investigates two questions: how much is the extra-cost of a CCS plant in the EU in comparison with China? Second, what is the CO2 price beyond which CCS plants become more profitable than reference plants in the EU and in China? To address these issues, I conducted a literature review on public studies about CCS costs. To objectively assess the profitability of CCS plants, I constructed a net present value model to calculate the Levelised Cost of Electricity and the breakeven CO2 price. CCS plants become the most profitable plant type beyond 115 /tCO(2) in the Eli vs. 45 (sic)/tCO(2) in China (offshore transport and storage costs). I advise on the optimal plant type choice depending on the CO2 price in both countries. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 340
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of future carbon prices on CCS investment for power generation in China
    Wu, Ning
    Parsons, John E.
    Polenske, Karen R.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 54 : 160 - 172
  • [2] What drives investment in wind energy? A comparative study of China and the European Union
    Ydersbond, Inga Margrete
    Korsnes, Marius Stoylen
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 12 : 50 - 61
  • [3] A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON FUNCTIONAL FOOD REGULATION BETWEEN CHINA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Yang, Y.
    Rong, S.
    Wang, Z.
    Xiang, X.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2013, 63 : 1638 - 1638
  • [4] China's Overseas Investment in the European Union
    Brown, Kerry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SPECTATOR, 2012, 47 (02): : 74 - 86
  • [5] EUROPEAN UNION INVESTMENT IN THE BALTIC STATES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Endriukaitiene, Janina
    Linkeviciute, Vilma
    Makutenas, Valdemaras
    Paliuliene, Lina
    [J]. MANAGEMENT THEORY AND STUDIES FOR RURAL BUSINESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 44 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [6] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT IN CHINA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Hao, Jianli
    Di Maria, Francesco
    Chen, Zhikun
    Yu, Shiwang
    Yu, Wenting
    Di Sarno, Luigi
    [J]. DETRITUS, 2020, 13 : 114 - 121
  • [7] The impact of electricity prices on foreign direct investment: evidence from the European Union
    Bartekova, Eva
    Ziesemer, Thomas H. W.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (11) : 1183 - 1198
  • [8] Bidirectional interactions between trading behaviors and carbon prices in European Union emission trading scheme
    Wang, Jiqiang
    Gu, Fu
    Liu, Yinpeng
    Fan, Ying
    Guo, Jianfeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 224 : 435 - 443
  • [9] National Security Review of Foreign Investment: A Comparative Legal Analysis of China, the United States and the European Union
    Wang, Anqi
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS-SAJIA, 2022, 29 (02): : 245 - 247
  • [10] Efficiency and factors influencing China's outward direct investment in ASEAN and the European Union: a comparative analysis
    Zhang, Jingxia
    Ogura, Akihiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHINESE ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2024,