Social Anxiety and Content Specificity of Interpretation and Judgemental Bias in Children

被引:18
|
作者
Vassilopoulos, Stephanos P. [1 ]
Banerjee, Robin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Primary Educ, GR-26110 Patras, Greece
[2] Univ Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
来源
INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT | 2012年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
social anxiety; cognitive bias; interpretation; judgemental bias; children; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; EMOTIONAL EVENTS; PHOBIA; DEPRESSION; PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENTS; SCALE; SELF;
D O I
10.1002/icd.746
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Previous research with adult samples has demonstrated that social anxiety disorder is associated with content-specific interpretation and judgemental biases. The present study extends our understanding of the specificity of cognitive biases in childhood social anxiety. A sample of non-clinical children aged 11-12years completed social anxiety and depression scales and was presented with scenarios depicting hypothetical events varying along two dimensions: relevance to self (event occurs to self or to other) and domain of activity (event is social or non-social). Partial support for the content-specificity hypothesis was found. Children's social anxiety symptoms were positively associated with negative interpretation ratings for ambiguous self-referent and other-referent events, but only when these events were in the social domain. Further, children's social anxiety symptoms were positively associated with emotional cost judgements for ambiguous social and non-social events, but only when these events referred to the self. Both patterns of results remained significant even after controlling for concurrent depressive symptoms. Implications of the results for our understanding of maintaining factors in childhood social anxiety are discussed. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 309
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Specificity of interpretation and judgemental biases in social phobia versus depression
    Voncken, M. J.
    Bogels, S. M.
    Peeters, F.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2007, 80 : 443 - 453
  • [2] Interpretation Bias and Social Anxiety
    Nader Amir
    Courtney Beard
    Emily Bower
    [J]. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2005, 29 : 433 - 443
  • [3] Interpretation bias in social anxiety
    Beard, C
    Amir, N
    [J]. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2005, 22 (04) : 194 - 194
  • [4] Interpretation bias and social anxiety
    Amir, N
    Beard, C
    Bower, E
    [J]. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2005, 29 (04) : 433 - 443
  • [5] Cognitive bias modification of interpretation in children with social anxiety disorder
    Orchard, Faith
    Apetroaia, Adela
    Clarke, Kiri
    Creswell, Cathy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2017, 45 : 1 - 8
  • [6] CONTENT SPECIFICITY OF ANXIETY SYMPTOMS TO PERFORMANCE-BASED INTERPRETATION BIAS DOMAINS IN YOUTH
    Waller, Claire R.
    Rozenman, Michelle
    Galvan, Adriana
    Peris, Tara S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 61 (10): : S186 - S186
  • [7] Interpretation bias and social anxiety in adolescents
    Miers, Anne C.
    Blote, Anke. W.
    Bogels, Susan M.
    Westenberg, P. Michiel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2008, 22 (08) : 1462 - 1471
  • [8] Interpretation bias and social anxiety: does interpretation bias mediate the relationship between trait social anxiety and state anxiety responses?
    Chen, Junwen
    Milne, Kirby
    Dayman, Janet
    Kemps, Eva
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2019, 33 (04) : 630 - 645
  • [9] Experimental modification of interpretation bias in socially anxious children: Changes in interpretation, anticipated interpersonal anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms
    Vassilopoulos, Stephanos P.
    Banerjee, Robin
    Prantzalou, Chara
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2009, 47 (12) : 1085 - 1089
  • [10] Interpretation Bias in Social Anxiety: A Dimensional Perspective
    Jonathan D. Huppert
    Edna B. Foa
    Jami M. Furr
    Jennifer C. Filip
    Andrew Mathews
    [J]. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2003, 27 : 569 - 577