Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change

被引:495
|
作者
Bellouin, N. [1 ]
Quaas, J. [2 ]
Gryspeerdt, E. [3 ]
Kinne, S. [4 ]
Stier, P. [5 ]
Watson-Parris, D. [5 ]
Boucher, O. [6 ]
Carslaw, K. S. [7 ]
Christensen, M. [5 ]
Daniau, A. -L. [8 ]
Dufresne, J. -L. [9 ]
Feingold, G. [10 ]
Fiedler, S. [4 ,28 ]
Forster, P. [11 ]
Gettelman, A. [12 ]
Haywood, J. M. [13 ,14 ]
Lohmann, U. [15 ]
Malavelle, F. [13 ]
Mauritsen, T. [16 ]
McCoy, D. T. [7 ]
Myhre, G. [17 ]
Muelmenstaedt, J. [2 ]
Neubauer, D. [15 ]
Possner, A. [18 ,19 ]
Rugenstein, M. [4 ]
Sato, Y. [20 ,21 ]
Schulz, M. [22 ]
Schwartz, S. E. [23 ]
Sourdeval, O. [2 ,24 ]
Storelvmo, T. [25 ]
Toll, V. [26 ]
Winker, D. [27 ]
Stevens, B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Reading, Berks, England
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Meteorol, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Imperial Coll London, Space & Atmospher Phys Grp, London, England
[4] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Oxford, Dept Phys, Atmospher Ocean & Planetary Phys, Oxford, England
[6] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, Inst Pierre Simon Laplace, Paris, France
[7] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[8] Univ Bordeaux, CNRS, EPOC, UMR 5805, Pessac, France
[9] Sorbonne Univ, PSL Res Univ, Ecole Normale Super, Lab Meteorol Dynam IPSL,CNRS,Ecole Polytech, Paris, France
[10] NOAA, ESRL, Chem Sci Div, Boulder, CO USA
[11] Univ Leeds, Priestley Int Ctr Climate, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[12] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[13] Univ Exeter, CEMPS, Exeter, Devon, England
[14] UK Met Off, Hadley Ctr, Exeter, Devon, England
[15] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[16] Stockholm Univ, Dept Meteorol, Stockholm, Sweden
[17] Ctr Int Climate & Environm Res Oslo CICERO, Oslo, Norway
[18] Carnegie Inst Sci, Dept Global Ecol, Stanford, CA USA
[19] Goethe Univ, Inst Atmospher & Environm Sci, Frankfurt, Germany
[20] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Appl Energy, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[21] Hokkaido Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Fac Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[22] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, Climate Modelling & Air Pollut Sect, Res & Dev Dept, Oslo, Norway
[23] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Environm & Climate Sci Dept, Upton, NY 11973 USA
[24] Univ Lille, Lab Opt Atmospher, Villeneuve Dascq, France
[25] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, Oslo, Norway
[26] Univ Tartu, Inst Phys, Tartu, Estonia
[27] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23665 USA
[28] Univ Cologne, Inst Geophys & Meteorol, Cologne, Germany
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 美国国家科学基金会; 欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODEL; CRYSTAL NUMBER CONCENTRATION; MARINE STRATOCUMULUS CLOUDS; BIOMASS BURNING EMISSIONS; LIQUID-WATER; BLACK CARBON; MIXED-PHASE; SATELLITE-OBSERVATIONS; CONVECTIVE CLOUDS; OPTICAL DEPTH;
D O I
10.1029/2019RG000660
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Aerosols interact with radiation and clouds. Substantial progress made over the past 40 years in observing, understanding, and modeling these processes helped quantify the imbalance in the Earth's radiation budget caused by anthropogenic aerosols, called aerosol radiative forcing, but uncertainties remain large. This review provides a new range of aerosol radiative forcing over the industrial era based on multiple, traceable, and arguable lines of evidence, including modeling approaches, theoretical considerations, and observations. Improved understanding of aerosol absorption and the causes of trends in surface radiative fluxes constrain the forcing from aerosol-radiation interactions. A robust theoretical foundation and convincing evidence constrain the forcing caused by aerosol-driven increases in liquid cloud droplet number concentration. However, the influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cloud liquid water content and cloud fraction is less clear, and the influence on mixed-phase and ice clouds remains poorly constrained. Observed changes in surface temperature and radiative fluxes provide additional constraints. These multiple lines of evidence lead to a 68% confidence interval for the total aerosol effective radiative forcing of -1.6 to -0.6Wm(-2), or -2.0 to -0.4Wm(-2) with a 90% likelihood. Those intervals are of similar width to the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment but shifted toward more negative values. The uncertainty will narrow in the future by continuing to critically combine multiple lines of evidence, especially those addressing industrial-era changes in aerosol sources and aerosol effects on liquid cloud amount and on ice clouds. Plain Language Summary Human activities emit into the atmosphere small liquid and solid particles called aerosols. Those aerosols change the energy budget of the Earth and trigger climate changes, by scattering and absorbing solar and terrestrial radiation and playing important roles in the formation of cloud droplets and ice crystals. But because aerosols are much more varied in their chemical composition and much more heterogeneous in their spatial and temporal distributions than greenhouse gases, their perturbation to the energy budget, called radiative forcing, is much more uncertain. This review uses traceable and arguable lines of evidence, supported by aerosol studies published over the past 40 years, to quantify that uncertainty. It finds that there are two chances out of three that aerosols from human activities have increased scattering and absorption of solar radiation by 14% to 29% and cloud droplet number concentration by 5 to 17% in the period 2005-2015 compared to the year 1850. Those increases exert a radiative forcing that offsets between a fifth and a half of the radiative forcing by greenhouse gases. The degree to which human activities affect natural aerosol levels, and the response of clouds, and especially ice clouds, to aerosol perturbations remain particularly uncertain.
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiative Forcing of Climate Change
    Keith P. Shine
    [J]. Space Science Reviews, 2000, 94 : 363 - 373
  • [2] Radiative forcing of climate change
    Shine, KP
    [J]. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2000, 94 (1-2) : 363 - 373
  • [3] Constraining the aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity
    Harvey, LDD
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2000, 44 (04) : 413 - 418
  • [4] Decrease in radiative forcing by organic aerosol nucleation, climate, and land use change
    Zhu, Jialei
    Penner, Joyce E.
    Yu, Fangqun
    Sillman, Sanford
    Andreae, Meinrat O.
    Coe, Hugh
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [5] Constraining the Aerosol Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity
    L. D. Danny Harvey
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2000, 44 : 413 - 418
  • [6] Decrease in radiative forcing by organic aerosol nucleation, climate, and land use change
    Jialei Zhu
    Joyce E. Penner
    Fangqun Yu
    Sanford Sillman
    Meinrat O. Andreae
    Hugh Coe
    [J]. Nature Communications, 10
  • [7] Critical Review on Radiative Forcing and Climate Models for Global Climate Change since 1970
    Lu, Qing-Bin
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (08)
  • [8] Global distribution and climate forcing of marine organic aerosol - Part 2: Effects on cloud properties and radiative forcing
    Gantt, B.
    Xu, J.
    Meskhidze, N.
    Zhang, Y.
    Nenes, A.
    Ghan, S. J.
    Liu, X.
    Easter, R.
    Zaveri, R.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (14) : 6555 - 6563
  • [9] Simultaneously constraining climate sensitivity and aerosol radiative forcing
    Harvey, LDD
    Kaufmann, RK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2002, 15 (20) : 2837 - 2861
  • [10] Effect of clouds on direct aerosol radiative forcing of climate
    Liao, H
    Seinfeld, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D4) : 3781 - 3788