Incorporating Added Sugar Improves the Performance of the Health Star Rating Front-of-Pack Labelling System in Australia

被引:19
|
作者
Peters, Sanne A. E. [1 ]
Dunford, Elizabeth [2 ,3 ]
Jones, Alexandra [3 ,4 ]
Mhurchu, Cliona Ni [5 ]
Crino, Michelle [3 ,6 ]
Taylor, Fraser [3 ]
Woodward, Mark [1 ,3 ,7 ]
Neal, Bruce [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, George Inst Global Hlth, Le Gros Clark Bldg,South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QX, England
[2] Univ N Carolina, Carolina Populat Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA
[3] Univ New South Wales, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[5] Univ Auckland, Natl Inst Hlth Innovat, Auckland 1072, New Zealand
[6] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
food policy; front-of-pack labelling; Health Star Rating; nutrition labels; public health; PROCESSED FOODS; NUTRITION; OBESITY;
D O I
10.3390/nu9070701
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: The Health Star Rating (HSR) is an interpretive front-of-pack labelling system that rates the overall nutritional profile of packaged foods. The algorithm underpinning the HSR includes total sugar content as one of the components. This has been criticised because intrinsic sugars naturally present in dairy, fruits, and vegetables are treated the same as sugars added during food processing. We assessed whether the HSR could better discriminate between core and discretionary foods by including added sugar in the underlying algorithm. Methods: Nutrition information was extracted for 34,135 packaged foods available in The George Institute's Australian FoodSwitch database. Added sugar levels were imputed from food composition databases. Products were classified as 'core' or 'discretionary' based on the Australian Dietary Guidelines. The ability of each of the nutrients included in the HSR algorithm, as well as added sugar, to discriminate between core and discretionary foods was estimated using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: 15,965 core and 18,350 discretionary foods were included. Of these, 8230 (52%) core foods and 15,947 (87%) discretionary foods contained added sugar. Median (Q1, Q3) HSRs were 4.0 (3.0, 4.5) for core foods and 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) for discretionary foods. Median added sugar contents (g/100 g) were 3.3 (1.5, 5.5) for core foods and 14.6 (1.8, 37.2) for discretionary foods. Of all the nutrients used in the current HSR algorithm, total sugar had the greatest individual capacity to discriminate between core and discretionary foods; AUC 0.692 (0.686; 0.697). Added sugar alone achieved an AUC of 0.777 (0.772; 0.782). A model with all nutrients in the current HSR algorithm had an AUC of 0.817 (0.812; 0.821), which increased to 0.871 (0.867; 0.874) with inclusion of added sugar. Conclusion: The HSR nutrients discriminate well between core and discretionary packaged foods. However, discrimination was improved when added sugar was also included. These data argue for inclusion of added sugar in an updated HSR algorithm and declaration of added sugar as part of mandatory nutrient declarations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE HEALTH STAR RATING FRONT-OF-PACK NUTRITION LABELLING SYSTEM BY INCORPORATING ADDED SUGAR
    Peters, Sanne
    Dunford, Elizabeth
    Jones, Alexandra
    Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
    Taylor, Fraser
    Woodward, Mark
    Neal, Bruce
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2017, 71 : 656 - 656
  • [2] SIMPLIFICATION OF THE HEALTH STAR RATING FRONT-OF-PACK NUTRITION LABELLING SYSTEM
    Peters, Sanne
    Dunford, Elizabeth
    Jones, Alexandra
    Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
    Taylor, Fraser
    Woodward, Mark
    Neal, Bruce
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2017, 71 : 656 - 657
  • [3] Consumer choice and the role of front-of-pack labelling: the Health Star Rating system
    Maganja, Damian
    Buckett, Kevin
    Stevens, Cherylyn
    Flynn, Elizabeth
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2019, 29 (01):
  • [4] FRONT-OF-PACK LABELLING AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW: REVISITING THE HEALTH STAR RATING SYSTEM
    Lai, Jessica C.
    Becher, Shmuel, I
    [J]. MELBOURNE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [5] Development of Australia's front-of-pack interpretative nutrition labelling Health Star Rating system: lessons for public health advocates
    Moore, Michael
    Jones, Alexandra
    Pollard, Christina M.
    Yeatman, Heather
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 43 (04) : 352 - 354
  • [6] Aligning front-of-pack labelling with dietary guidelines: including whole grains in the health star rating
    Byron, Caitlin
    Kissock, Katrina R.
    Barrett, Eden M.
    Beck, Eleanor J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2024, 63 (06) : 2025 - 2033
  • [7] Australia's Health Star Rating policy process: Lessons for global policy-making in front-of-pack nutrition labelling
    Kumar, Medha
    Gleeson, Deborah
    Barraclough, Simon
    [J]. NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2018, 75 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [8] Effects of a Voluntary Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling System on Packaged Food Reformulation: The Health Star Rating System in New Zealand
    Mhurchu, Cliona Ni
    Eyles, Helen
    Choi, Yeun-Hyang
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2017, 9 (08):
  • [9] Australian Consumers Are Willing to Pay for the Health Star Rating Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label
    Cooper, Sheri L.
    Butcher, Lucy M.
    Scagnelli, Simone D.
    Lo, Johnny
    Ryan, Maria M.
    Devine, Amanda
    O'Sullivan, Therese A.
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 16
  • [10] The impact of voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labelling on packaged food reformulation: A difference-in-differences analysis of the Australasian Health Star Rating scheme
    Bablani, Laxman
    Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
    Neal, Bruce
    Skeels, Christopher L.
    Staub, Kevin E.
    Blakely, Tony
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (11)