Characteristics of BDS Signal-in-Space User Ranging Errors and Their Effect on Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Performance

被引:10
|
作者
Wang, Zhipeng [1 ]
Shao, Wei [1 ]
Li, Rui [1 ]
Song, Dan [1 ]
Li, Tinglin [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ARAIM; signal-in-space user range errors; false alert probability; availability; GLONASS BROADCAST CLOCK; STATISTICAL CHARACTERIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/s18124475
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Signal-In-Space User Range Errors (SIS UREs) are assumed to be overbounded by a normal distribution with a standard deviation represented by the User Range Accuracy (URA). The BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) broadcast URA is not compatible with the historical SIS URE performance that affects the Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM) False Alert Probability (Pfa) and availability evaluation. This study compares the BDS broadcast and precise ephemeris from 1 March 2013 to 1 March 2017 to obtain SIS UREs. Through analyzing the statistical characteristics of the SIS UREs, we obtain the standard deviation sigma(URE) for the accuracy and continuity and sigma(URA) used for the integrity of the SIS UREs. The results show that the broadcast sigma(URA) of 2 m cannot completely overbound SIS UREs for all BDS satellites, but the sigma(URA) of 2.4 m can. Then, we use the sigma(URA) of 2.4 m to evaluate the ARAIM Pfa and availability. The results show that the Pfa may increase to 2 x 10(-5) and exceed its limit by an order of magnitude. We also consider the differences between the SIS UREs of Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO), Inclined Geo-Synchronous Orbit (IGSO), and Medium Earth Orbit (MEO). The results indicate that all Pfa values calculated by the computed sigma(URE) are less than the Pfa in the Integrity Support Message (ISM) for the worst-performing GEO satellite. The approximately 55% Pfa calculated by the computed sigma(URE) is less than the Pfa in ISM for the worst-performing IGSO satellite. Most Pfa values calculated by the computed sigma(URE) is less than the Pfa in the ISM for the worst-performing MEO satellite. For BDS satellites, the Pfa is mainly affected by sigma(URE). When the sigma(URA) of 2.4 m is used to evaluate the availability, the computed availability is lower than the availability calculated by the broadcast sigma(URA)/sigma(URE) and the greatest degradation can reach 25%.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Performance assessment of the signal-in-space ranging errors of BDS-3: statistical characterization and integrity standard
    Wang, Guangxing
    Cui, Yilun
    Hu, Zhigang
    Su, Xing
    Wu, Beiping
    [J]. GPS SOLUTIONS, 2023, 27 (04)
  • [2] Performance assessment of the signal-in-space ranging errors of BDS-3: statistical characterization and integrity standard
    Guangxing Wang
    Yilun Cui
    Zhigang Hu
    Xing Su
    Beiping Wu
    [J]. GPS Solutions, 2023, 27
  • [3] Characterizing BDS signal-in-space performance from integrity perspective
    Wang, Shizhuang
    Zhai, Yawei
    Zhan, Xingqun
    [J]. NAVIGATION-JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION, 2021, 68 (01): : 157 - 183
  • [4] Performance of BeiDou-3 signal-in-space ranging errors: accuracy and distribution
    Bing Xue
    Haitao Wang
    Yunbin Yuan
    [J]. GPS Solutions, 2021, 25
  • [5] Optimal Risk Allocation for BDS/GPS Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring
    Sun, Yuan
    Wang, Taosheng
    Wang, Zhipeng
    Zhang, Jun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION, 2015, : 687 - 695
  • [6] Performance of BeiDou-3 signal-in-space ranging errors: accuracy and distribution
    Xue, Bing
    Wang, Haitao
    Yuan, Yunbin
    [J]. GPS SOLUTIONS, 2021, 25 (01)
  • [7] Statistical Characterization of GNSS Signal-in-Space Ranging Errors for the User Within and Beyond Space Service Volume
    Zhou, Yifan
    Wang, Yueke
    Huang, Wende
    Sun, Leyuan
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 168116 - 168125
  • [8] Evaluation of Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Performance on Predicted Aircraft Trajectories
    Paternostro, S.
    Moore, T.
    Hill, C.
    Atkin, J.
    Morvan, H. P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 IEEE/ION POSITION, LOCATION AND NAVIGATION SYMPOSIUM (PLANS), 2016, : 842 - 856
  • [9] Parametric Performance Study of Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM) for Combined GNSS Constellations
    Rippl, Markus
    Spletter, Alexandru
    Guenther, Christoph
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION, 2011, : 285 - 295
  • [10] Parity Space Projection Line Based Fault Detection Method for Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring
    Zhao, Peng
    Zhu, Yanbo
    Xue, Rui
    Zheng, Lei
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 40836 - 40845