Integrating Non-Animal Test Information into an Adaptive Testing Strategy - Skin Sensitization Proof of Concept Case

被引:72
|
作者
Jaworska, Joanna [1 ]
Harol, Artsiom [1 ]
Kern, Petra S. [1 ]
Gerberick, G. Frank [2 ]
机构
[1] Procter & Gamble Eurocor, B-1853 Strombeek Bever, Belgium
[2] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Innovat Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
integrated testing strategy; skin sensitization; Bayesian network; LLNA potency; PEPTIDE REACTIVITY ASSAY; LYMPH-NODE DATA; IN-VITRO; CONTACT ALLERGENS; CELL-LINE; CLASSIFICATION; POTENCY; REQUIREMENTS; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.14573/altex.2011.3.211
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
There is an urgent need to develop data integration and testing strategy frameworks allowing interpretation of results from animal alternative test batteries. To this end, we developed a Bayesian Network Integrated Testing Strategy (BN ITS) with the goal to estimate skin sensitization hazard as a test case of previously developed concepts (Jaworska et al., 2010). The BN ITS combines in silico, in chemico, and in vitro data related to skin penetration, peptide reactivity, and dendritic cell activation, and guides testing strategy by Value of Information (VoI). The approach offers novel insights into testing strategies: there is no one best testing strategy, but the optimal sequence of tests depends on information at hand, and is chemical-specific. Thus, a single generic set of tests as a replacement strategy is unlikely to be most effective. BN ITS offers the possibility of evaluating the impact of generating additional data on the target information uncertainty reduction before testing is commenced.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 225
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Skin Sensitization Testing: The Ascendancy of Non-Animal Methods
    Basketter, David A.
    Gerberick, George F.
    [J]. COSMETICS, 2022, 9 (02)
  • [2] Bayesian evaluation of non-animal information to support decision making-Skin sensitization test case
    Jaworska, Joanna
    Harol, Artsiom
    Kern, Petra
    Gerberick, G. Frank
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 189 : S239 - S239
  • [3] Non-animal testing for skin sensitization: Replacement or mere supplement?
    Urbisch, D.
    Wareing, B.
    Honarvar, N.
    Kolle, S. N.
    Landsiedel, R.
    [J]. NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 390 : S22 - S22
  • [4] Non-animal testing for skin sensitization: Replacement or mere supplement?
    Urbisch, D.
    Honarvar, N.
    Kolle, S. N.
    Landsiedel, R.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 258 : S309 - S309
  • [5] Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials
    Annette Mehling
    Tove Eriksson
    Tobias Eltze
    Susanne Kolle
    Tzutzuy Ramirez
    Wera Teubner
    Bennard van Ravenzwaay
    Robert Landsiedel
    [J]. Archives of Toxicology, 2012, 86 : 1273 - 1295
  • [6] Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials
    Mehling, Annette
    Eriksson, Tove
    Eltze, Tobias
    Kolle, Susanne
    Ramirez, Tzutzuy
    Teubner, Wera
    van Ravenzwaay, Bennard
    Landsiedel, Robert
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 86 (08) : 1273 - 1295
  • [7] Cosmetics as a test case for non-animal testing?
    Rogiers, V.
    Vanhaecke, T.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 238 (02) : S48 - S48
  • [8] A Roadmap for the Development of Alternative (Non-Animal) Methods for Skin Sensitization Testing
    Kimber, Ian
    Basketter, David A.
    [J]. ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2012, 29 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [9] State of the art in non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing: from individual test methods towards testing strategies
    Ezendam, Janine
    Braakhuis, Hedwig M.
    Vandebriel, Rob J.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 90 (12) : 2861 - 2883
  • [10] State of the art in non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing: from individual test methods towards testing strategies
    Janine Ezendam
    Hedwig M. Braakhuis
    Rob J. Vandebriel
    [J]. Archives of Toxicology, 2016, 90 : 2861 - 2883