Applications of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Supplier Selection: A Literature Review

被引:0
|
作者
Otheman, Adawiyah
Abdullah, Lazim [1 ]
Ab Ghani, Ahmad Termimi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Terengganu, Sch Informat & Appl Math, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
关键词
Supplier Selection; Multi-Criteria Decision Making; Fuzzy Set Theory; Value and Utility; Multiple Objectives Programming; MODEL; CHAIN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Supplier selection is one of the most important decisions since inappropriate decision may affect the whole supply chain management. Various multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)approaches have been proposed to solve this problem. Some journal articles reviewed the literature regarding to supplier evaluation and selection models. However, most of them were very general and fail to focus on a specific knowledge domain. This paper aims to review specifically on the applications of fuzzy MCDM to supplier selection problem. We extend the previous reviews by gathering related articles appearing in international journals and conference proceedings. The review was made from 2000-2013 and split into two categories; value and utility theory approaches and multiple objective programming approaches. From the observation, we noticed that 58% were used value and utility theory approaches against 42% of multiple objective programming. About 45% of approaches in value and utility theory approaches were based on AHP. This paper offers useful information for other researchers since it provides the latest evidence of fuzzy MCDM approaches in supplier selection. The ability to continually innovate a new decision making method is a driving force for the applications of various utility and programming based MCDM approaches and this will allow many new future applications specifically to supplier selections.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 491
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Review of Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods for Intelligent Supplier Selection
    Akburak, Dilek
    [J]. INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS: DIGITAL ACCELERATION AND THE NEW NORMAL, INFUS 2022, VOL 2, 2022, 505 : 655 - 663
  • [2] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection
    Dalalah, Doraid
    Hayajneh, Mohammed
    Batieha, Farhan
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (07) : 8384 - 8391
  • [3] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Yildiz, A.
    Yayla, A. Y.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 26 (02): : 158 - 177
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review
    Ho, William
    Xu, Xiaowei
    Dey, Prasanta K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 202 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [5] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION: A LITERATURE CRITIQUE
    Manucharyan, Hayk
    [J]. INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 2021, 12 (01): : 329 - 352
  • [6] A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach for Supplier Selection Under Fuzzy Environment
    Sarwar, Adnan
    Zeng, Ziqiang
    AduAgyapong, Richard
    Nguyen ThiHoaiThuong
    Qadeer, Talat
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 708 - 720
  • [7] Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using fuzzy AHP approach
    Yadav, Vinod
    Sharma, Milind Kumar
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 22 (06) : 1158 - 1174
  • [8] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for supplier selection in supply chain management
    Sreekumar
    Mahapatra, S. S.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 3 (04): : 168 - 177
  • [9] A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method
    Boran, Fatih Emre
    Genc, Serkan
    Kurt, Mustafa
    Akay, Diyar
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (08) : 11363 - 11368
  • [10] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier rating
    Lee, Hsuan-Shih
    [J]. 2005 ICSC Congress on Computational Intelligence Methods and Applications (CIMA 2005), 2005, : 282 - 287