Cathelicidins in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii)

被引:24
|
作者
Peel, E. [1 ]
Cheng, Y. [1 ]
Djordjevic, J. T. [2 ,3 ]
Fox, S. [4 ]
Sorrell, T. C. [2 ,3 ]
Belov, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Vet Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Westmead Inst Med Res, Ctr Infect Dis & Microbiol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Marie Bashir Inst Infect Dis & Biosecur, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Dept Primary Ind Pk Water & Environm, 134 Macquarie St, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2016年 / 6卷
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
ANTIBACTERIAL PEPTIDE LL-37; TAMMAR WALLABY; ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDE; POUCH YOUNG; IDENTIFICATION; EVOLUTION; MEMBRANES; FAMILY; ESTRUS;
D O I
10.1038/srep35019
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Tasmanian devil joeys, like other marsupials, are born at a very early stage of development, prior to the development of their adaptive immune system, yet survive in a pathogen-laden pouch and burrow. Antimicrobial peptides, called cathelicidins, which provide innate immune protection during early life, are expressed in the pouch lining, skin and milk of devil dams. These peptides are active against pathogens identified in the pouch microbiome. Of the six characterised cathelicidins, Saha-CATH5 and 6 have broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and are capable of killing problematic human pathogens including methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis, while Saha-CATH3 is active against fungi. Saha-CATH5 and 6 were toxic to human A549 cells at 500 mu g/mL, which is over seven times the concentration required to kill pathogens. The remaining devil cathelicidins were not active against tested bacterial or fungal strains, but are widely expressed throughout the body, such as in immune tissues, in digestive, respiratory and reproductive tracts, and in the milk and pouch, which indicates that they are likely also important components of the devil immune system. Our results suggest cathelicidins play a role in protecting naive young during pouch life by passive immune transfer in the milk and may modulate pouch microbe populations to reduce potential pathogens.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cathelicidins in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii)
    E. Peel
    Y. Cheng
    J. T. Djordjevic
    S. Fox
    T. C. Sorrell
    K. Belov
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 6
  • [2] A review of parasites in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii)
    Liana F. Wait
    Sarah Peck
    Samantha Fox
    Michelle L. Power
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2017, 26 : 509 - 526
  • [3] Anaplastic meningioma in a Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii)
    Elbert, Jessica
    Peck, Sarah
    Hayes, Dane
    Taylor, Jim
    Smith, Jodi
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD CASE REPORTS, 2019, 7 (01):
  • [4] A review of parasites in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii)
    Wait, Liana F.
    Peck, Sarah
    Fox, Samantha
    Power, Michelle L.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2017, 26 (03) : 509 - 526
  • [5] RETINAL PROJECTIONS IN THE TASMANIAN DEVIL, SARCOPHILUS-HARRISII
    SANDERSON, KJ
    HAIGHT, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1980, 130 (JAN) : 208 - 209
  • [6] RETINAL PROJECTIONS IN THE TASMANIAN DEVIL, SARCOPHILUS-HARRISII
    SANDERSON, KJ
    PEARSON, LJ
    HAIGHT, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1979, 188 (02) : 335 - 345
  • [8] Hormonal control of birth behavior in the Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii
    Rose, R. W.
    Bell, L.
    Shaw, G.
    [J]. HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR, 2006, 50 (03) : 417 - 423
  • [9] Development and evaluation of electroejaculation techniques in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii)
    Keeley, T.
    Harris, M.
    McGreevy, P. D.
    Hudson, D.
    O'Brien, J. K.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 24 (07) : 1008 - 1018
  • [10] The Immune Response of the Tasmanian Devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) and Devil Facial Tumour Disease
    Gregory M. Woods
    Alexandre Kreiss
    Katherine Belov
    Hannah V. Siddle
    David L. Obendorf
    H. Konrad Muller
    [J]. EcoHealth, 2007, 4 : 338 - 345