Dimensionality, responsiveness and standardization of the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale in the ultra-short therapy with antipsychotics in patients with severe manic episodes

被引:30
|
作者
Bech, P [1 ]
Baastrup, PC
de Bleeker, E
Ropert, R
机构
[1] Frederiksborg Cent Cty Hosp, Psychiat Res Unit, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Glostrup, Denmark
[3] Psychiat Hosp Glain, Univ Unit, St Lucia, Belgium
[4] Hosp Psychiat, St Lucia, Belgium
[5] Ctr Hosp St Anne, Paris, France
关键词
psychiatric status rating scales; psychometrics; bipolar disorder; manic disorder; antipsychotics;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00244.x
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Typical antipsychotics have their indication in the ultra-short (first week) treatment of severe episodes of mania. In this setting the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale (MAS) was psychometrically compared with the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) to assess its ability to measure response. Method: Ratings on patients with marked to severe mania (n = 80) who participated in the clinical trials to evaluate the ultra-short antimanic effect of zuclopenthixol acetate were assessed. The MAS was analysed for internal validity (total score a sufficient statistic) and for external validity. Results: The MAS was shown to have a high internal validity showing onset of action already after days of treatment. After 6 days of treatment 53% of the patients responded according to the MAS but only 30% according to the CGI. The difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The MAS has been found to be a valid scale to measure early onset of action and response in the ultra-short antimanic treatment with typical antipsychotics.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 30
页数:6
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale and Young Mania Rating Scale comparison of psychometric properties of the two instruments for rating a manic syndrome
    Wciorka, Jacek
    Schaeffer, Ewa
    Switaj, Piotr
    Waszkiewicz, Justyna
    Krasuska, Katarzyna
    Wegrzyn, Jacek
    Wozniak, Piotr
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIA POLSKA, 2011, 45 (01) : 61 - 78