User-generated content (UGC) misclassification and its effects

被引:10
|
作者
Rajamma, Rajasree K. [1 ]
Paswan, Audhesh [2 ]
Spears, Nancy [2 ]
机构
[1] Fairfield Univ, Dept Mkt, Fairfield, CT 06430 USA
[2] Univ North Texas, Dept Mkt & Logist, Denton, TX 76203 USA
关键词
Online reviews; User-generated content; Consumer misclassification; Consumer-to-consumer information sharing; WORD-OF-MOUTH; SOURCE CREDIBILITY; PERCEIVED RISK; PRODUCT; IDENTIFICATION; COMMUNICATION; IMPACT; MISCOMPREHENSION; MISATTRIBUTION; ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
10.1108/JCM-08-2018-2819
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose User-generated content (UGC), e.g. YouTube videos on social media, is all around us. These UGCs are primarily demonstrational and/or informational in their execution format. However, viewers could easily misclassify the UGCs and that may be detrimental to the focal product in the UGC. This study aims to investigate this phenomenon. Design/methodology/approach The study uses an online survey (N = 459). The respondents were randomly exposed to one of the two UGCs - informational or demonstrational - and then responded to questions measuring their attribution and their purchase intention towards the focal product in the UGC. Findings Results indicate that about 20% of the respondents misclassified the type of UGC. Further, UGC characteristics such as vicarious experience, transparency and connectedness significantly enhance purchase intention, especially for demonstrational videos; demonstrational UGC, when correctly perceived yield the most favorable results; and misclassification does suppress these relationships. Research limitations/implications - This study contributes to the theory and practice by linking the viewer evaluation of UGC on various evaluative dimensions (i.e. vicarious experience, connectedness, transparency and perceived risk), purchase intention towards the focal product in the UGC and correct or incorrect classification of the UGC format (demonstrational or informational). This study adds to the knowledge base about UGC by highlighting some of the pitfalls when viewers misclassify the UGC format and emphasizes the importance of a match between the content of the UGC and the perceptions and expectations associated with the medium on which it is uploaded. Like any other research, this study too has its limitations. It has only looked at a few possible variables that would predict the purchase intention in the context of the complex and rich phenomenon of UGC. Future studies should look at other sources of misclassification. Practical implications - Given the ubiquitous nature of social media and their role in consumer decision-making, the findings of this study have serious practical implications. The results of the study highlight steps to be taken by both creators and marketers to improve effectiveness of UGCs. Social implications While this study does not focus on the social aspects of UGCs, it is not difficult to imagine the phenomenon of UGC misclassification, either as a mistake or deliberately induced and its social implications. Fake news seems to be not uncommon. Originality/value Even though the impact of consumer-to-consumer information exchange and UGC on consumers' brand attitude and purchase intention is well recognized, there is limited research on this topic. Further, to the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to explicitly examine the concept of misclassification and corresponding issues in the context of UGCs.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 138
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On quality control of user-generated content (UGC) compression
    Li, Yang
    Zhang, Xinfeng
    Wang, Shiqi
    Ma, Siwei
    Kuo, Chung-Chieh Jay
    [J]. APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XLIV, 2021, 11842
  • [2] User-Generated Content (UGC)/In-The-Wild Video Content Recognition
    Leszczuk, Mikolaj
    Janowski, Lucjan
    Nawala, Jakub
    Grega, Michal
    [J]. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND DATABASE SYSTEMS, ACIIDS 2022, PT II, 2022, 13758 : 356 - 368
  • [3] Exploring the User-Generated Content (UGC) Uploading Behavior on YouTube
    Park, Jaimie Y.
    Jang, Jiyeon
    Jaimes, Alejandro
    Chung, Chin-Wan
    Myaeng, Sung-Hyon
    [J]. WWW'14 COMPANION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB, 2014, : 529 - 534
  • [4] How user-generated content (UGC) campaign changes electoral politics?
    Chang, Woo-Young
    Yin, Seong-yi
    [J]. KOREA OBSERVER, 2008, 39 (03) : 369 - 406
  • [5] A Brief Tutorial on How to Extract Information from User-Generated Content (UGC)
    Egger, Marc
    Lang, Andre
    [J]. KUNSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ, 2013, 27 (01): : 53 - 60
  • [6] User-generated content
    Wofford, Jennifer
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2012, 14 (07) : 1236 - 1239
  • [7] User-generated content
    Greenfield, David
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2009, 56 (10) : 2 - 2
  • [8] Using Single Source Data to Better Understand User-generated Content (UGC) Behavior
    Lu, Heng
    Zhu, Jonathan J. H.
    [J]. 2014 PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM 2014), 2014, : 790 - 795
  • [9] User-Generated Content and Its Effect on Technical Communication
    Walwema, Josephine
    Sarat-St Peter, Hilary
    Chong, Felicia
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION, 2019, 62 (04) : 315 - 317
  • [10] User-Generated Content Introduction
    Krumm, John
    Davies, Nigel
    Narayanaswami, Chandra
    [J]. IEEE PERVASIVE COMPUTING, 2008, 7 (04) : 10 - 11