A comparative Life Cycle Assessment of external wall-compositions for cleaner construction solutions in buildings

被引:74
|
作者
Ingrao, Carlo [1 ]
Scrucca, Flavio [2 ]
Tricase, Caterina [1 ]
Asdrubali, Francesco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Econ, Via R Caggese 1, I-71121 Foggia, Italy
[2] Univ Perugia, Dept Engn, Via G Duranti 67, I-06125 Perugia, Italy
[3] Univ Rome Tre, Dept Engn, Via Vito Volterra 62, I-00146 Rome, Italy
关键词
Buildings; Wall compositions; Recycled material; Life Cycle Assessment; Energy efficiency; Environmental sustainability; THERMAL INSULATION PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; INVENTORY ANALYSIS; ENERGY BUILDINGS; EMBODIED ENERGY; TEXTILE WASTE; IMPACT; LCA; GREEN; PARTICLEBOARDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.112
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in buildings is usually performed at the envelope scale, mainly for comparison of several sample-solutions, and provides in-depth analyses of the related energy and environmental performances. In this way, it is possible to identify those solutions that perform best in energy and environmental terms, and that so are suitable for construction of sustainable buildings. In this context, the study was aimed at carrying out energy and environmental assessments to compare four external-wall samples characterised by different rates of sophistication in terms of assembly technologies and component materials. The samples considered were properly designed for development of the subsequent energy environmental analysis. In particular, two "standard" wall compositions and two ventilated facades were considered, using rock-wool and recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (R-PET) as insulating materials. The study documented that, as regards both energy and environmental impacts, ventilated facades perform quite well compared to the "standard" wall compositions, especially when equipped with R-PET. It also confirmed that both solutions easy to be disassembled and recycled materials are key design choices for environmental sustainable and low energy demanding buildings along their whole life cycles. Finally, the authors believe that the study provides helpful insights on the environmental sustain ability of eco-friendly materials and technologies, and can contribute to less time and resources consuming LCAs at the building scale. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 298
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative life cycle assessment of four buildings in Greenland
    Ryberg, Morten Walbech
    Ohms, Pernille Krogh
    Moller, Eva
    Lading, Tove
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 204
  • [2] Life-Cycle Assessment Modeling of Construction Processes for Buildings
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    Ries, Robert J.
    Matthews, H. Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2010, 16 (03) : 199 - 205
  • [3] Comparative life cycle assessment of flooring options for sustainable buildings
    Choudhary, Kailash
    Sangwa, Narpat Ram
    Sangwan, Kuldip Singh
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND, 2023,
  • [4] Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings
    Escamilla, Edwin Zea
    Habert, Guillaume
    Correal Daza, Juan Francisco
    Archilla, Hector F.
    Echeverry Fernandez, Juan Sebastian
    Trujillo, David
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [5] Dynamic assessment elements and their prospective solutions in dynamic life cycle assessment of buildings
    Su, Shu
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zhu, Yimin
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 158 : 248 - 259
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of buildings
    Kohler, Niklaus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION: CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 86 : 14 - 16
  • [7] Comparative assessment of life cycle impacts of curtain wall mullions
    Azari-N, Rahman
    Kim, Yong-Woo
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 48 : 135 - 145
  • [8] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames: A Case Study of Two Residential Buildings in Iran
    Oladazimi, Amir
    Mansour, Saeed
    Hosseinijou, Seyed Abbas
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2020, 10 (03)
  • [9] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BASED AT THE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ON HOISTWAY OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
    Garcia Sanz-Calcedo, Justo
    Pena-Corpa, Sergio
    [J]. DYNA, 2014, 89 (01): : 98 - 105
  • [10] Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of thermal insulation materials of buildings
    Pargana, Nuno
    Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte
    Silvestre, Jose Dinis
    de Brito, Jorge
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 82 : 466 - 481