Priority projects for the implementation of CCS power generation with enhanced oil recovery in Mexico

被引:6
|
作者
Gonzalez-Diaz, Abigail [1 ]
Ortencia Gonzalez-Diaz, Maria [3 ]
Alcaraz-Calderon, Agustin M. [1 ]
Gibbins, Jon [2 ]
Lucquiaud, Mathieu [2 ]
机构
[1] INEEL, Reforma 113, Cuernavaca 62490, Morelos, Mexico
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Engn, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Ctr Invest Cient Yucatan AC, CONACyT, Calle 43 130, Merida 97200, Yucatan, Mexico
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
CO2; capture; Capture ready; Retrofit; New power plants; Enhanced oil recovery; GAS COMBINED CYCLES; CARBON CAPTURE; CO2; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.07.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In March 2014, Mexico launched its CCUS technology roadmap, outlining the actions to be taken up to 2024. One important action is the National Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) ready and the identification of priority natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) with capture plants. This outcome could aid the creation of a technology roadmap for the design of new NGCC power plants and their operational requirements for EOR and for the reduction of CO2 emissions. This article provides an overview of the opportunities for deploying CCS in new NGCC power plants in Mexico which were programed to begin operation throughout the period from 2016 to 2030. The attention is given to plants close to oil fields which are candidates for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), located in an inclusion zone suitable for storage. The Gulf of Mexico region, where potential EOR sites and the presence of industrial CO2 sources are located, is within the inclusion zone for recommended sites for geological storage of CO2. After identifying new power plants in the inclusion zone, this article analyses which existing plants could be retrofitted and which new power plants could be designed to be 'carbon capture ready'. In addition, the distance and the volumes of CO2 are estimated.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 125
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tracer monitoring of enhanced oil recovery projects
    Dugstad, O.
    Viig, S.
    Krognes, B.
    Kleven, R.
    Huseby, O.
    TRACER 6 - THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRACERS AND TRACING METHODS, 2013, 50
  • [2] PROSPECTS FOR OIL SUPPLIES FROM ENHANCED OIL-RECOVERY PROJECTS
    GRIFFITH, JD
    JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1982, 21 (05): : 49 - 53
  • [3] Jumpstarting CCS using refinery CO2 for enhanced oil recovery
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
    Keating, Gordon N.
    Pawar, Rajesh J.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 2185 - 2191
  • [4] LOOKING AT CO2 RECOVERY IN ENHANCED-OIL-RECOVERY PROJECTS
    PRICE, BC
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1984, 82 (52) : 48 - 53
  • [5] WELL TEST ANALYSIS FOR ENHANCED OIL-RECOVERY PROJECTS
    IKOKU, CU
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1982, 104 (02): : 142 - 148
  • [6] TREATING EMULSIONS FROM ENHANCED OIL-RECOVERY PROJECTS
    BESSLER, DU
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1980, 179 (MAR): : 14 - CMEC
  • [7] ANALYSIS OF TRENDS IN USA ENHANCED OIL-RECOVERY PROJECTS
    Thomas, R. D.
    Stosur, G. J.
    Pautz, J. F.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1989, 2 (2-3) : 149 - 157
  • [8] Some questions on enhanced oil recovery methods implementation
    Kaschavtsev, VE
    NEFTYANOE KHOZYAISTVO, 2002, (09): : 69 - 72
  • [9] LOOKING AT CO2 RECOVERY IN ENHANCED-OIL-RECOVERY PROJECTS.
    Price, Brian C.
    Oil and Gas Journal, 1984, 82 (52): : 48 - 53
  • [10] VALUATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AND ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PROJECTS WITH RISK ANALYSIS.
    MacDonald, R.C.
    Campbell, J.E.
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1986, 38 (01): : 57 - 69