Active imaging system performance model for target acquisition

被引:2
|
作者
Espinola, Richard L. [1 ]
Teaney, Brian [1 ]
Nguyen, Quang [1 ]
Jacobs, Eddie L. [2 ]
Halford, Carl E. [2 ]
Tofsted, David H. [3 ]
机构
[1] USA, RDECOM, CERDEC, Night Vis & Elect Sensor Directorate, Ft Belvoir, VA 22060 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[3] US Army Res Lab, Computat & Informat Sci Directorate, White Sands Missile Range, Adelphi, MD 20783 USA
关键词
laser range gate; infrared sensors; speckle; scintillation;
D O I
10.1117/12.719714
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The U.S. Army RDECOM CERDEC Night Vision & Electronic Sensors Directorate has developed a laser-range-gated imaging system performance model for the detection, recognition, and identification of vehicle targets. The model is based on the established US Army RDECOM CERDEC NVESD sensor performance models of the human system response through an imaging system. ne Java-based model, called NVLRG, accounts for the effect of active illumination, atmospheric attenuation, and turbulence effects relevant to LRG imagers, such as speckle and scintillation, and for the critical sensor and display components. This model can be used to assess the performance of recently proposed active SWIR systems through various trade studies. This paper will describe the NVLRG model in detail, discuss the validation of recent model components, present initial trade study results, and outline plans to validate and calibrate the end-to-end model with field data through human perception testing.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling the target acquisition performance of active imaging systems
    Espinola, Richard L.
    Jacobs, Eddie L.
    Halford, Carl E.
    Vollmerhausen, Richard
    Tofsted, David H.
    [J]. OPTICS EXPRESS, 2007, 15 (07): : 3816 - 3832
  • [2] A survey of the research on target acquisition performance modeling of infrared imaging system
    Zhang Jian
    Li Hua
    Li Bin
    Yan Jiong-long
    [J]. ISTM/2009: 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 2268 - 2271
  • [3] AUTOMATIC TRACKING IMPROVED PERFORMANCE FOR ELECTRO-OPTICAL IMAGING AND TARGET ACQUISITION-SYSTEM
    BUCHANAN, SP
    [J]. OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY, 1980, 12 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [4] Active sonar target imaging and classification system
    Burton, LL
    Lai, H
    [J]. DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS II, 1997, 3079 : 19 - 33
  • [5] Target acquisition performance: effects of target aspect angle, dynamic imaging and signal processing
    Beintema, Jaap A.
    Bijl, Piet
    Hogervorst, Maarten A.
    Dijk, Judith
    [J]. INFRARED IMAGING SYSTEMS: DESIGN, ANALYSIS, MODELING, AND TESTING XIX, 2008, 6941
  • [6] Display noise effects on infrared system target acquisition performance
    Burks, Stephen D.
    Teaney, Brian P.
    [J]. INFRARED IMAGING SYSTEMS: DESIGN, ANALYSIS, MODELING, AND TESTING XXI, 2010, 7662
  • [7] Human target acquisition performance
    Teaney, Brian P.
    Du Bosq, Todd W.
    Reynolds, Joseph P.
    Thompson, Roger
    Aghera, Sameer
    Moyer, Steve K.
    Flug, Eric
    Espinola, Richard
    Hixson, Jonathan
    [J]. INFRARED IMAGING SYSTEMS: DESIGN, ANALYSIS, MODELING, AND TESTING XXIII, 2012, 8355
  • [8] Target acquisition performance comparison of active continuous-wave and range-gated imaging systems at 1.6 and 2.1 μm
    Follansbee, Joshua
    Burrell, Derek
    Furxhi, Orges
    Renshaw, C. Kyle
    Lund, John
    Driggers, Ronald
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 62 (09)
  • [9] Target Acquisition Performance Modeling of Infrared Imaging Systems: Past, Present, and Future
    Ratches, James A.
    Vollmerhausen, Richard H.
    Driggers, Ronald G.
    [J]. IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2001, 1 (01) : 31 - 40
  • [10] PERFORMANCE OF A SATELLITE-BORNE INFRARED TARGET ACQUISITION-SYSTEM
    LYNCH, JR
    [J]. CANADIAN AERONAUTICS AND SPACE JOURNAL, 1972, 18 (10): : 333 - 334