Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market

被引:33
|
作者
Lin, Yatang [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Yu [3 ]
Yang, Yang [4 ]
Zhu, Hongjia [5 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Environm & Sustainabil, Dept Econ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Social Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Real Estate, 4 Architecture Dr, Singapore 117566, Singapore
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, CUHK Business Sch, Sch Hotel & Tourism Management, 12 Chak Cheung St, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Jinan Univ, Inst Econ & Social Res, 601 West Huangpu Rd, Guangzhou 510632, Peoples R China
关键词
Land use regulation; Industrial land; Minimum price; China; RESTRICTIONS; DISTORTIONS; SPRAWL; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial market that results from low transaction prices; it varies across counties or districts. We show that this policy increases the overall land-use intensity in the industrial market: for each additional 100 yuan increase in imposed minimum prices, the unit transaction prices range from 31.4 to 59.7 yuan higher, and the output and total factor productivity of new entrants range from 11.8% to 16.1% higher, respectively. Furthermore, we provide suggestive evidence that higher minimum prices reduce the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions, which has the effect of increasing the industrial output per unit of land.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of land price regulation on land-use intensity: evidence from Chinese minimum land price regulation policy
    Zhao, Aidong
    Huang, Jinsheng
    Ploegmakers, Huub
    Van der Krabben, Erwin
    Ma, Xianlei
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (32) : 3668 - 3677
  • [2] The Natural and Socioeconomic Influences on Land-Use Intensity: Evidence from China
    Chen, Longgao
    Yang, Xiaoyan
    Li, Long
    Chen, Longqian
    Zhang, Yu
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (11)
  • [3] Price competition and market concentration: Evidence from the land market in China
    Zhao, Aidong
    Ploegmakers, Huub
    Samsura, Ary Adriansyah
    van der Krabben, Erwin
    Ma, Xianlei
    [J]. CITIES, 2024, 144
  • [4] Exploring the Impact of Industrial Land Price Distortion on Carbon Emission Intensity: Evidence from China
    Gao, Bo-yang
    Huang, Zhi-ji
    Zhang, Ting-ting
    Sun, Xiao-yu
    Song, Ming-yue
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [5] Politics and entry deterrence: Evidence from China's industrial land market
    Wang, Chunyang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2024, 33 (03) : 686 - 705
  • [6] Effect of land price distortion on land use efficiency: Evidence from China
    Yu, Yantuan
    Luo, Nengsheng
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022,
  • [7] Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China
    Han, Wenjing
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    Zheng, Xian
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 92
  • [8] China's land resources and land-use change: insights from the 1996 land survey
    Lin, GCS
    Ho, SPS
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2003, 20 (02) : 87 - 107
  • [9] Do land markets improve land-use efficiency? evidence from Jiangsu, China
    Liu, Ziming
    Zhang, Lan
    Rommel, Jens
    Feng, Shuyi
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (03) : 317 - 330
  • [10] Spatial pattern of arable land-use intensity in China
    Ye, Sijing
    Song, Changqing
    Shen, Shi
    Gao, Peichao
    Cheng, Changxiu
    Cheng, Feng
    Wan, Changjun
    Zhu, Dehai
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 99