Rapid Response, Monitoring, and Mitigation of Induced Seismicity near Greeley, Colorado

被引:19
|
作者
Yeck, W. L. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Sheehan, A. F. [2 ,5 ]
Benz, H. M. [1 ]
Weingarten, M. [3 ,4 ]
Nakai, J. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Natl Earthquake Informat Ctr, Denver Fed Ctr, MS 966,Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Geol Sci, 399 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Geophys, 397 Panama Mall Room 367, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Dept Geol Sci, 399 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, 216 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
DENVER EARTHQUAKES; FLUID INJECTION; MAGNITUDE; SEQUENCE; PARADOX;
D O I
10.1785/0220150275
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
On 1 June 2014 (03:35 UTC), an M-w 3.2 earthquake occurred in Weld County, Colorado, a historically aseismic area of the Denver-Julesburg basin. Weld County is a prominent area of oil and gas development, including many high-rate class II wastewater injection wells. In the days following the earthquake, the University of Colorado, with support from the U.S. Geological Survey and Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology-Portable Array Seismic Studies of the Continental Lithosphere, rapidly deployed six seismic stations to characterize the seismicity associated with the 1 June earthquake (the Greeley sequence) and to investigate its possible connection to wastewater disposal. The spatial and temporal proximity of earthquakes to a high-rate wastewater disposal well strongly suggests these earthquakes were induced. Scientific communication between the university, state agencies, and the energy industry led to rapid mitigation strategies to reduce the occurrence of further earthquakes. Mitigation efforts included implementing a temporary moratorium on injection at the well, cementing the bottom portion of the disposal well to minimize hydrologic connectivity between the disposal formation and the underlying crystalline basement, and subsequently allowing injection to resume at lower rates. Following the resumption of wastewater disposal, microseismicity was closely monitored for both increases in earthquake rate and magnitude. Following mitigation efforts, between 13 August 2014 and 29 December 2015, no earthquakes larger than M 1.5 occurred near the Greeley sequence. This study demonstrates that a detailed and rapid characterization of a seismic sequence in space and time relative to disposal, combined with collaboration and communication between scientists, regulators, and industry, can lead to objective and actionable mitigation efforts that potentially reduced the rate of earthquakes and the possible generation of larger earthquakes.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 847
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the effectiveness of induced seismicity mitigation: Numerical modeling of wastewater injection near Greeley, Colorado
    Brown, Megan R. M.
    Ge, Shemin
    Sheehan, Anne F.
    Nakai, Jenny S.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2017, 122 (08) : 6569 - 6582
  • [2] Monitoring of induced seismicity in Albania
    Muco, B
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, VOLS 1-3, 1997, : 885 - 889
  • [3] Spatiotemporal Clustering of Seismicity in the Kiskatinaw Seismic Monitoring and Mitigation Area
    Khajehdehi, Omid
    Eaton, David W.
    Davidsen, Joern
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [4] A risk-mitigation approach to the management of induced seismicity
    Julian J. Bommer
    Helen Crowley
    Rui Pinho
    Journal of Seismology, 2015, 19 : 623 - 646
  • [5] A risk-mitigation approach to the management of induced seismicity
    Bommer, Julian J.
    Crowley, Helen
    Pinho, Rui
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2015, 19 (02) : 623 - 646
  • [6] Monitoring and Mitigation of Movements Affecting Foundations on Expansive Soils in Colorado
    Reins, John D.
    Volz, Jennifer J.
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2013, 27 (06) : 731 - 736
  • [7] Mining seismicity in the Witwatersrand Basin: monitoring, mechanisms and mitigation strategies in perspective
    Riemer, K. L.
    Durrheim, R. J.
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 4 (03) : 228 - 249
  • [8] Mining seismicity in the Witwatersrand Basin:monitoring,mechanisms and mitigation strategies in perspective
    K. L. Riemer
    R. J. Durrheim
    Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 4 (03) : 228 - 249
  • [9] Induced seismicity constraints on subsurface geological structure, Paradox Valley, Colorado
    Block, Lisa V.
    Wood, Christopher K.
    Yeck, William L.
    King, Vanessa M.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 200 (02) : 1170 - 1193
  • [10] Induced seismicity response of hydraulic fracturing: results of a multidisciplinary monitoring at the Wysin site, Poland
    J. A. López-Comino
    S. Cesca
    J. Jarosławski
    N. Montcoudiol
    S. Heimann
    T. Dahm
    S. Lasocki
    A. Gunning
    P. Capuano
    W. L. Ellsworth
    Scientific Reports, 8