Sewage sludge handling with phosphorus utilization -: life cycle assessment of four alternatives

被引:85
|
作者
Johansson, Kristin
Perzon, Maria
Froling, Morgan
Mossakowska, Agnes
Svanstrom, Magdalena [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] MIT, Lab Energy & Environm, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Stockholm Water Co, Environm & Dev, SE-10636 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
municipal sludge treatment; restoration of mining area; composting; agriculture; supercritical water oxidation; SCWO; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Four handling options for sewage sludge were studied from an environmental system's perspective using life cycle assessment. The studied options were restoration of mining areas, composting with other biomatetials for use on golf courses, hygienisation through storage for agricultural use, and supercritical water oxidation with phosphorus recovery. The results are discussed in terms of impact on global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and the use of finite resources and primary energy. A very large impact of including biogeochernical emissions from sludge handling and spreading on land can be seen. System expansions for replaced artificial fertilizers also had a major influence on the results. It is clear that it is important for the environmental outcome of sludge treatment options that biogeochernical emissions from sludge are minimized and that nutrients and other resources are utilized efficiently. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 151
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative life cycle assessment of deinking sludge utilization alternatives
    Deviatkin, Ivan
    Kapustina, Viktoriia
    Vasilieva, Elena
    Isyanov, Lev
    Horttanainen, Mika
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 3232 - 3243
  • [2] Comparative assessment of sewage sludge disposal alternatives in Mashhad: a life cycle perspective
    Fatemeh Rostami
    Seyyed Mohammad Tafazzoli
    Samaneh Tavakoli Aminian
    Akram Avami
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 315 - 333
  • [3] Comparative assessment of sewage sludge disposal alternatives in Mashhad: a life cycle perspective
    Rostami, Fatemeh
    Tafazzoli, Seyyed Mohammad
    Aminian, Samaneh Tavakoli
    Avami, Akram
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (01) : 315 - 333
  • [4] Environmental performance of dewatered sewage sludge digestate utilization based on life cycle assessment
    Havukainen, Jouni
    Saud, Ali
    Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard
    Peltola, Petteri
    Horttanainen, Mika
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 137 : 210 - 221
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge management: A review
    Yoshida, Hiroko
    Christensen, Thomas H.
    Scheutz, Charlotte
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2013, 31 (11) : 1083 - 1101
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of biochar and hydrochar derived from sewage sludge: Material or energy utilization?
    Gievers, Fabian
    Mainardis, Matia
    Catenacci, Arianna
    Loewen, Achim
    Nelles, Michael
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2025, 16
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of phosphorus alternatives for Swedish agriculture
    Linderholm, Kersti
    Tillman, Anne-Marie
    Mattsson, Jan Erik
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2012, 66 : 27 - 39
  • [8] Combined Life Cycle Environmental and Exergetic Assessment of Four Typical Sewage Sludge Treatment Techniques in China
    Dong, Jun
    Chi, Yong
    Tang, Yuanjun
    Wang, Fei
    Huang, Qunxing
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2014, 28 (03) : 2114 - 2122
  • [9] Analysis of the effects of prepyrolysis hydrothermal treatment on phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge using a life cycle assessment
    Chen, Chang
    Wei, Renhao
    Shi, Feng
    Ma, Xiao
    Zhou, Xiangjun
    Xiong, Qiao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 377
  • [10] Life cycle assessment indicators of urban wastewater and sewage sludge treatment
    Buonocore, Elvira
    Mellino, Salvatore
    De Angelis, Giuseppe
    Liu, Gengyuan
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 94 : 13 - 23