Optimisation of business process designs: An algorithmic approach with multiple objectives

被引:26
|
作者
Vergidis, K. [1 ]
Tiwari, A.
Majeed, B.
Roy, R.
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Mfg Dept, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] IS Lab, Comp Intelligence Grp, Martlesham 1P5 3RE, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
business process (bp); bp optimisation; bp re-design; bp modelling and analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.032
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Most of the current attempts for business process optimisation are manual without involving any formal automated methodology. This paper proposes a framework for multi-objective optimisation of business process designs. The framework uses a generic business process model that is formally defined and specifies process cost and duration as objective functions. The business process model is programmed and incorporated into a software platform where a selection of multi-objective optimisation algorithms is applied to a range of test designs including a real example. The test business process designs are of varying complexity and are optimised with three popular optimisation techniques (Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA2), Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm II (SPEA2) and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimisation (MOPSO) algorithms). The results indicate that although business process optimisation is a highly constrained problem with fragmented search space; multi-objective optimisation algorithms such as NSGA2 and SPEA2 produce a satisfactory number of alternative optimised business process designs. However, the performance of the optimisation algorithms drops sharply as the complexity of the process designs increases. This paper also discusses the directions for future research in this particular area. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 121
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Generation of Business Process Reference Model Considering Multiple Objectives
    Yahya, Bernardo Nugroho
    Wu, Jei-Zheng
    Bae, Hyerim
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2012, 11 (03): : 233 - 240
  • [2] Scheduling in flowshop and cellular manufacturing systems with multiple objectives - A genetic algorithmic approach
    Sridhar, J
    Rajendran, C
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 1996, 7 (04) : 374 - 382
  • [3] Decision-making approach of objectives of business process reengineering
    Zhou, Yong-Hua
    Chen, Yu-Liu
    [J]. Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2002, 8 (11): : 870 - 875
  • [4] Process to Planet Approach to Sustainable Process Design: Multiple Objectives and Byproducts
    Tapajyoti Ghosh
    Bhavik R. Bakshi
    [J]. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 51 : 936 - 948
  • [5] Process to Planet Approach to Sustainable Process Design: Multiple Objectives and Byproducts
    Ghosh, Tapajyoti
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 51 (06) : 936 - 948
  • [6] A new optimal approach for multiple optimisation objectives grid resource allocation and scheduling
    Li Chunlin
    Li Layuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2008, 39 (12) : 1127 - 1138
  • [7] An algorithmic approach to constructing supersaturated designs
    Nguyen, NK
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 1996, 38 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [8] Modeling Business Objectives for Business Process Management
    Lohrmann, Nilatthias
    Reichert, Manfred
    [J]. S-BPM ONE - SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 2012, 104 : 106 - 126
  • [9] An algorithmic framework for tool switching problems with multiple objectives
    Furrer, Martina
    Mutze, Torsten
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 259 (03) : 1003 - 1016
  • [10] Algorithmic Assurance: An Active Approach to Algorithmic Testing using Bayesian Optimisation
    Gopakumar, Shivapratap
    Gupta, Sunil
    Rana, Santu
    Vu Nguyen
    Venkatesh, Svetha
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 31 (NIPS 2018), 2018, 31