The Globalization of Production and Income Inequality in Rich Democracies

被引:24
|
作者
Mahutga, Matthew C. [1 ]
Roberts, Anthony [2 ]
Kwon, Ronald [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Sociol, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Sociol, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[3] Univ Calif Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
EXPLAINING DEINDUSTRIALIZATION; ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION; PRODUCTION NETWORKS; WELFARE-STATE; INSECURITY; FINANCIALIZATION; REDISTRIBUTION; PARTISANSHIP; ORGANIZATION; INSTITUTIONS;
D O I
10.1093/sf/sox041
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Despite prominent and compelling theoretical arguments linking manufacturing imports from the global South to rising income inequality in the global North, the literature has produced decidedly mixed support for such arguments. We explain this mixed support by introducing intervening processes at the global and national levels. At the global level, evolving characteristics of global production networks (GPNs) amplify the effect of Southern imports. At the national level, wage coordination and welfare state generosity counteract the mechanisms by which Southern imports increase inequality, and thereby mitigate their effects. We conduct a time-series cross-section regression analyses of income inequality among eighteen advanced capitalist countries to test these propositions. Our analysis addresses alternative explanations, as well as validity threats related to model specification, sample composition, and measurement. We find substantial variation in the effect of Southern imports across global and national contexts. Southern imports have no systematic effect on income inequality until the magnitude of GPN activity surpasses its world-historical average, or in states with above-average levels of wage coordination and welfare state generosity. With counterfactual analyses, we show that Southern imports would have led to much different inequality trajectories in the North if there were fewer GPNs, and if the prevailing degrees of wage coordination and welfare state generosity were higher. The countervailing effects of GPNs and institutional context call for theories of inequality at the intersection of the global and the national, and raise important questions about distributional politics in the years to come.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 213
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Political Inequality in Rich Democracies
    Elsaesser, Lea
    Schaefer, Armin
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 26 : 469 - 487
  • [2] Globalization of production, manufacturing employment, and income inequality in developing nations
    Pandian, Roshan K.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2024, 118
  • [3] Political Determinants of Income Inequality in Emerging Democracies
    Das, Dilip K.
    [J]. DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 2018, 56 (01): : 66 - 68
  • [4] Political Determinants of Income Inequality in Emerging Democracies
    Harada, Yutaka
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 18 (01) : 235 - 237
  • [5] The Effect of Globalization on National Income Inequality
    Bussmann, Margit
    De Soysa, Indra
    Oneal, John
    [J]. COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 4 (3-4) : 285 - 312
  • [6] Globalization, global income inequality and poverty
    Bigman, D
    [J]. CHALLENGE OF GLOBAL CHAINS: INTEGRATING DEVELOPING COUNTRIES INTO INTERNATIONAL CHAINS, A POTENTIAL RISK OR AN OPPORTUNITY?, 2002, : 70 - 72
  • [7] GLOBALIZATION, FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INCOME INEQUALITY
    Daisaka, Hiroshi
    Furusawa, Taiji
    Yanagawa, Noriyuki
    [J]. PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 19 (05) : 612 - 633
  • [8] Income Inequality in Capitalist Democracies: The Interplay of Values and Institutions
    Kenworthy, Lane
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 2009, 38 (06) : 571 - 572
  • [9] Has Globalization Deepened Income Inequality in Mexico?
    Borraz, Fernando
    Lopez-Cordova, Jose Ernesto
    [J]. GLOBAL ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (01):
  • [10] Does globalization affect top income inequality?
    Cabral, Rene
    Garcia-Diaz, Rocio
    Varella Mollick, Andre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2016, 38 (05) : 916 - 940