How to accelerate antimicrobial susceptibility testing

被引:86
|
作者
Idelevich, E. A. [1 ]
Becker, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Munster, Inst Med Microbiol, Domagkstr 10, D-48149 Munster, Germany
关键词
Antibiotic Direct susceptibility testing; Inoculum effect; Lag phase; MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry; Phenotypic susceptibility testing; Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Rapid diagnostics; DESORPTION IONIZATION-TIME; FLIGHT MASS-SPECTROMETRY; POSITIVE BLOOD CULTURES; RAPID DETECTION; BACTERIAL IDENTIFICATION; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; CARBAPENEM RESISTANCE; DIRECT INOCULATION; ESCHERICHIA-COLI;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmi.2019.04.025
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results are crucial for timely administration of effective antimicrobial treatment, and, thus, should be made available to clinicians as fast as possible. In particular, increasing rates of multidrug-resistant organisms emphasize the need for rapid AST (rAST). Objectives: This article aims to provide microbiologists and clinicians with a critical overview of the current state of possibilities to accelerate AST. We also intend to discuss technical and strategic aspects of rAST, which may be helpful to academic researchers and assay developers in the industry. Sources: We have reviewed literature on rAST methods and their implementation in routine diagnostics. Content: Phenotypic rAST is universal, mechanism-independent and allows exact categorization, but it demands time for the microorganisms to start the growth and to express the response to antibiotics. Detection of selected resistance mechanisms is more rapid, but the interpretation of its clinical impact is limited. Technical challenges of phenotypic rAST include inoculum effect, delayed expression of resistance, lag phase and initial biomass increase in susceptible isolates. Criteria for a successful rAST assay are ease of use, random access, capacity for simultaneous testing of multiple specimens, affordability and financial attractiveness for industry. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based AST seems to be particularly promising, as it can optimally be combined with MALDI-TOF MS identification. Direct testing from clinical specimens provides particularly early findings, with positive blood cultures being the most suitable specimen type. Polymicrobial samples and inoculum effect are serious obstacles for direct AST from other clinical specimens. Next to the technology improvement, optimization of pre-analytics and laboratory organization is essential. (C) 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1347 / 1355
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Novel electronic biosensor for automated inoculum preparation to accelerate antimicrobial susceptibility testing
    Putney, Suzanne
    Theiss, Andrew H.
    Rajan, Nitin K.
    Deak, Eszter
    Buie, Creighton
    Ngo, Yvonne
    Shah, Hima
    Yuan, Victoria
    Botbol-Ponte, Elizabeth
    Hoyos-Urias, Adrian
    Knopfmacher, Oren
    Hogan, Catherine A.
    Banaei, Niaz
    Herget, Meike S.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [2] Novel electronic biosensor for automated inoculum preparation to accelerate antimicrobial susceptibility testing
    Suzanne Putney
    Andrew H. Theiss
    Nitin K. Rajan
    Eszter Deak
    Creighton Buie
    Yvonne Ngo
    Hima Shah
    Victoria Yuan
    Elizabeth Botbol-Ponte
    Adrian Hoyos-Urias
    Oren Knopfmacher
    Catherine A. Hogan
    Niaz Banaei
    Meike S. Herget
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [3] A Novel Platform Using RNA Signatures To Accelerate Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Neisseria gonorrhoeae
    Hashemi, Marjan M.
    Ram-Mohan, Nikhil
    Yang, Xi
    Andini, Nadya
    Gessner, Nicholas R.
    Carroll, Karen C.
    Wang, Tza-Huei
    Yang, Samuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (12)
  • [4] ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING
    RYAN, KJ
    SHERRIS, JC
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1976, 7 (03) : 277 - 286
  • [5] How long until routine Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial susceptibility testing?
    Montes, Milagrosa
    Perez-Trallero, Emilio
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 17 (02): : 130 - 131
  • [6] European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) Technical Notes on antimicrobial susceptibility testing
    Kahlmeter, G.
    Brown, D. F. J.
    Goldstein, F. W.
    MacGowan, A. P.
    Mouton, J. W.
    Odenholt, I.
    Rodloff, A.
    Soussy, C-J.
    Steinbakk, M.
    Soriano, F.
    Stetsiouk, O.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2006, 12 (06) : 501 - 503
  • [7] Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures: a comparison of the Accelerate Pheno™ and VITEK® 2 systems
    Schneider, Jack G.
    Wood, James B.
    Smith, Nathan W.
    Emery, Christopher L.
    Davis, Thomas E.
    Manaloor, John J.
    Bocian, Brittany
    Schmitt, Bryan H.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 95 (03)
  • [8] THE VALUE OF ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING
    PRESCOTT, J
    [J]. CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 1992, 33 (08): : 484 - 484
  • [9] STANDARDIZATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING
    BARRY, AL
    [J]. CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1989, 9 (02) : 203 - 219
  • [10] Improving antimicrobial susceptibility testing
    Barenfanger, J
    Drake, C
    Kharhori, N
    [J]. LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1998, 29 (01) : 45 - 52