共 9 条
- [2] PROFESSIONAL ISSUES ARISING FROM PSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN COURT [J]. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 35 (NOV): : 431 - 431
- [3] PROFESSIONAL ISSUES ARISING FROM PSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN COURT [J]. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1983, 36 (JAN): : 25 - 25
- [4] PROFESSIONAL ISSUES ARISING FROM PSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN COURT [J]. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1983, 36 (JUN): : 217 - 217
- [5] PROFESSIONAL ISSUES ARISING FROM PSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN COURT [J]. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1983, 36 (AUG): : 296 - 296
- [6] PROFESSIONAL ISSUES ARISING FROM PSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN COURT - A REPLY [J]. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 35 (SEP): : 332 - 333
- [7] Factors that predict patient outcome in primary care psychological therapies: current evidence and methodological issues [J]. PRIMARY CARE PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 6 (01): : 15 - 21
- [8] Using the "hot tub"-How concurrent expert evidence aids understanding issues The Hon. Justice Steven Rares Judge, Federal Court of Australia [J]. CIVIL JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2012, 31 (01): : 30 - 42
- [9] THE FRYE-RULE IS OUT - IS JUNK SCIENCE IN - COMMENTS ON THE RECENT SUPREME-COURT DECISION ON ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR THE EXPERT-WITNESS - A TOXICOLOGISTS PERSPECTIVE [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 14 (01): : 61 - 68