Understanding of informed consent by demented individuals

被引:51
|
作者
Buckles, VD
Powlishta, KK
Palmer, JL
Coats, M
Hosto, T
Buckley, A
Morris, JC
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Immunol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.WNL.0000098933.34804.FC
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The informed consent process is central to the conduct of research but may be difficult for cognitively impaired participants to understand. The authors developed a brief test addressing the elements of informed consent for a specific minimum-risk nontreatment research protocol. Objective: To evaluate and document understanding of informed consent by elderly research participants across a range of dementia severity. Methods: The elements of informed consent regarding participation in a longitudinal study of healthy aging and dementia were reviewed with both demented (n = 250) and nondemented (n = 165) participants who then completed a short test requiring yes-no responses to assess understanding of these elements. Demented participants had very mild, mild, or moderate dementia as staged by the Clinical Dementia Rating. Results: After adjusting for education, performance on the test varied with dementia severity in mean differences and by correlation. All nondemented and very mildly demented participants and 92% of mildly demented participants provided correct answers for at least 8 of 10 true-false items, whereas only 67% of the moderately demented participants achieved this level of accuracy. Conclusions: Demented individuals, very mild and mild, understood informed consent information for this nontreatment research study. Understanding notably declined in the moderate stage of dementia. Brief tests may be useful as one method to assess understanding of the consent process for specific studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1662 / 1666
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding of informed consent by demented individuals (vol 61, pg 1662, 2003)
    Buckles
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2004, 62 (04) : 678 - 678
  • [2] UNDERSTANDING INFORMED CONSENT
    THORNTON, H
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982): : 1047 - 1048
  • [3] Understanding informed consent
    Macklin, R
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1999, 38 (01) : 83 - 87
  • [4] Informed Consent, Understanding, and Trust
    Resnik, David B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2021, 21 (05): : 61 - 63
  • [5] Objectually Understanding Informed Consent
    Wilkenfeld, Daniel A.
    [J]. ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 62 (01) : 33 - 56
  • [6] Informed Consent, Disclosure, and Understanding
    Dougherty, Tom
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2020, 48 (02) : 119 - 150
  • [7] Informed Consent: The Understanding of Lawyers and Courts
    Godinho, Adriano Marteleto
    Lanziotti, Livia Hallack
    de Morais, Bruno Salome
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2010, 60 (02): : 207 - 214
  • [8] Informed Consent and the Requirement to Ensure Understanding
    Walker, Tom
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY, 2012, 29 (01) : 50 - 62
  • [9] Subjective assessment of understanding of informed consent
    Buckles, VD
    Hosto, T
    Powlishta, KK
    Palmer, JL
    Buckley, AA
    Coats, M
    Johnson, DK
    Roe, CM
    Morris, JC
    [J]. NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2004, 25 : S322 - S322
  • [10] Consent with understanding: a movement towards informed decisions
    Mayberry, MK
    Mayberry, JF
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2002, 2 (06) : 523 - 526