Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia does not appear to raise serum prostate-specific antigen concentration

被引:44
|
作者
Alexander, EE
Qian, JQ
Wollan, PC
Myers, RP
Bostwick, DG
机构
[1] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DEPT PATHOL,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
[2] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DEPT UROL,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
[3] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DEPT BIOSTAT,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00004-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives, Conflicting findings have been reported regarding the relationship between prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration. This study evaluates whether high-grade PIN significantly raises serum PSA concentration. Methods. We evaluated 194 totally embedded whole-mounted radical prostatectomy specimens removed for clinically localized prostate cancer. No patient received preoperative therapy. In each specimen, the volume of high-grade PIN and carcinoma was calculated using the grid-counting method. Serum PSA concentration was determined prior to surgery. Cancer volume, gland weight, Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, and PIN volume were then compared according to serum PSA concentration and PSA density. Results. Of the 194 patients, 170 (88%) had high-grade PIN-associated cancer and 24 (12%) had PIN-free cancer within the specimen. PIN volume ranged from 0 to 8.1 cc (mean, 1.3) and cancer volume ranged from 0 to 56.9 cc (mean, 9.1). In a subset of 93 patients with small cancers (less than 6.0 cc), PIN volume ranged from 0 to 6.1 (mean, 0.83) and did not correlate with serum PSA concentration or PSA density (P = 0.80 and P = 0.69, respectively). In the entire study group, PIN volume did not correlate with PSA density (P = 0.17), but did correlate with serum PSA concentration (P = 0.005). Using multiple regression analysis, adjusting for cancer volume, gland weight, Gleason score, and extraprostatic extension, log PIN volume did not contribute to log serum PSA concentration (regression coefficient -0.108; P = 0.51) or log PSA density (regression coefficient -0.104; P = 0.56) in small cancers (less than 6.0 cc). In the entire study group, log PIN volume did not contribute to log serum PSA concentration (regression coefficient -0.182; P = 0.055) or log PSA density (regression coefficient -0.202; P = 0.56). Conclusions. Our data indicate that high-grade PIN does not significantly contribute to serum PSA concentration. We suggest that patients with elevated serum PSA concentration found to have high-grade PIN on transrectal biopsy should not have their elevated serum PSA concentration attributed to high-grade PIN.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 698
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN
    PORTER, JR
    BRAWER, MK
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 11 (04) : 196 - 200
  • [2] PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN
    BRAWER, MK
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1989, 34 (06) : 62 - 65
  • [3] DOES HIGH-GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA RESULT IN ELEVATED SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS
    RONNETT, BM
    CARMICHAEL, MJ
    CARTER, HB
    EPSTEIN, JI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02): : 386 - 389
  • [4] Production of serum-free and total prostate-specific antigen due to prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Minardi, D
    Galosi, AB
    Dell'Atti, L
    Hanitzsch, H
    Mario, P
    Muzzonigro, G
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 36 (05): : 323 - 329
  • [5] Ratio of free to total prostate-specific antigen in patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Kiliç, S
    Kukul, E
    Danisman, A
    Güntekin, E
    Sevük, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1998, 34 (03) : 176 - 180
  • [6] DOES PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA (PIN) RESULT IN ELEVATED SERUM PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN (PSA) LEVELS
    RONNETT, BM
    CARMICHAEL, M
    EPSTEIN, JI
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1993, 68 (01) : A67 - A67
  • [7] Precursor of prostate-specific antigen expression in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma: a study of 90 cases
    Hull, David
    Ma, Jun
    Singh, Harpreet
    Hossain, Deloar
    Qian, Junqi
    Bostwick, David G.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (07) : 915 - 918
  • [8] USE OF TRANS-RECTAL ULTRASOUND AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    LEE, F
    TORPPEDERSEN, ST
    CARROLL, JT
    SIDERS, DB
    CHRISTENSENDAY, C
    MITCHELL, AE
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1989, 34 (06) : 4 - 8
  • [9] Plasma metabolomic profile in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer and associations with the prostate-specific antigen and the Gleason score
    Markin, Pavel A.
    Brito, Alex
    Moskaleva, Natalia
    Lartsova, Ekaterina, V
    Shpot, Yevgeny, V
    Lerner, Yulia, V
    Mikhajlov, Vasily Y.
    Potoldykova, Natalia, V
    Enikeev, Dimitry, V
    La Frano, Michael R.
    Appolonova, Svetlana A.
    [J]. METABOLOMICS, 2020, 16 (07)
  • [10] Plasma metabolomic profile in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer and associations with the prostate-specific antigen and the Gleason score
    Pavel A. Markin
    Alex Brito
    Natalia Moskaleva
    Ekaterina V. Lartsova
    Yevgeny V. Shpot
    Yulia V. Lerner
    Vasily Y. Mikhajlov
    Natalia V. Potoldykova
    Dimitry V. Enikeev
    Michael R. La Frano
    Svetlana A. Appolonova
    [J]. Metabolomics, 2020, 16