Contrasting Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Power Control Performance in UTRAN LTE Uplink by UE Trace Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Muellner, Robert [1 ]
Ball, Carsten F. [1 ]
Ivanov, Kolio [1 ]
Lienhart, Johann [1 ]
Hric, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co KG, Radio Access, Munich, Germany
关键词
LTE; open-loop PC; closed-loop PC; FPC; UL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Uplink power control in UTRAN Long Term Evolution consists of an open-loop scheme handled by the User Equipment and closed-loop power corrections determined and signaled by the network. In this study the difference in performance between pure open-loop and combined open and closed-loop power control has been analyzed and the different behavior of fractional vs. full path-loss compensation has been evaluated. A comprehensive system level simulation model has been used with a facility to trace a particular test user during its motion from eNodeB towards the cell border and back to its initial position. This study demonstrates the effect of distance path-loss of a test user on several physical layer performance metrics including throughput, resource allocation as well as modulation and coding scheme utilization. Simulation results in a fully loaded network show high throughput for open-loop fractional power control for the user located in the vicinity of the serving eNodeB, however, steep performance degradation has been observed when the user is moving towards the cell edge. The user throughput at the cell border can be increased by the closed-loop component. The benefit of closed-loop power control is the higher homogeneity in terms of throughput across the entire network area and the ability to automatically stabilize the network performance under different conditions like cell load and traffic distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:4031 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open-loop and closed-loop control of flying qubits
    Lucamarini, M.
    Di Giuseppe, G.
    Vitali, D.
    Tombesi, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS B-ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND OPTICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 44 (15)
  • [2] From open-loop learning to closed-loop control
    Jansson, H
    Hjalmarsson, H
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-4, 2002, : 4209 - 4214
  • [3] ON THE COMPARISON OF THE DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF OPEN-LOOP AND CLOSED-LOOP MECHANISMS
    Rastegar, Jahangir
    Feng, Dake
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2014, VOL 5B, 2014,
  • [4] OPEN-LOOP VERSUS CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL OF PROCESSOR LOADING
    SCHOUTE, FC
    [J]. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 1990, 11 (03) : 201 - 208
  • [5] OPEN-LOOP HYDROSTATIC DRIVES APPROACH CLOSED-LOOP PERFORMANCE
    SMITH, PM
    [J]. MACHINE DESIGN, 1984, 56 (11) : 79 - 82
  • [6] SUBOPTIMAL CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL FROM OPEN-LOOP ALGORITHMS
    WRIGHT, FW
    LAWS, B
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS-LONDON, 1976, 123 (07): : 713 - 718
  • [7] Closed-loop designed open-loop control of quantum systems: An error analysis
    Zhang, Shikun
    Zhang, Guofeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE-ENGINEERING AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2024, 361 (16):
  • [8] Comparisons between Quantum Open-Loop Control and Closed-Loop Control
    Bo, Qi
    Lei, Guo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOL 7, 2008, : 393 - 397
  • [9] Performance Evaluation of Uplink Closed Loop Power Control for LTE System
    Muhammad, Bilal
    Mohammed, Abbas
    [J]. 2009 IEEE 70TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE FALL, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 1661 - 1665
  • [10] OPEN-LOOP AND CLOSED-LOOP NASH STRATEGIES
    SANDELL, NR
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (04) : 435 - 436