Reduced dynamic orbit determination using GPS code and carrier measurements

被引:190
|
作者
Montenbruck, O [1 ]
van Helleputte, T
Kroes, R
Gill, E
机构
[1] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt, German Space Operat Ctr, D-82230 Wessling, Germany
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Earth Observat & Space Syst, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
关键词
orbit determination; GPS; LEO satellites; GRACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2005.01.003
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The three-dimensional nature of Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements provides a unique opportunity for accurately determining the position and velocity of satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO). For optimum results a reduced dynamic technique is commonly preferred, which combines the merits of kinematic positioning techniques with those of a fully dynamic trajectory modeling. As part of the present study two different approaches to reduced dynamic orbit determination are compared, both of which involve the estimation of empirical accelerations on top of a precise deterministic force model. In the batch least-squares estimator piece-wise constant accelerations are adjusted in consecutive sub-intervals that are sufficiently short compared to the orbital period. The extended Kalman filter/smoother approach, on the other hand, estimates the empirical accelerations using a first-order Gauss-Markov process noise model. Software implementations of both estimation methods have been used with GPS measurements of the GRACE mission to assess the individual merits of the different filtering schemes. Both approaches are shown to provide accurate and compatible results, which match an external reference solution to better than 5 cm when processing dual-frequency data and better than 10 cm when using single-frequency measurements. While the extended Kalman filter/smoother requires less computer resources in terms of memory and processing time, the batch least-squares estimator ensures a better smoothness of the resulting trajectory and was found to be more robust in case of data gaps. (c) 2005 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 271
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DYNAMIC ORBIT DETERMINATION USING GPS MEASUREMENTS FROM TOPEX POSEIDON
    SCHUTZ, BE
    TAPLEY, BD
    ABUSALI, PAM
    RIM, HJ
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1994, 21 (19) : 2179 - 2182
  • [2] Efficient LEO dynamic orbit determination with triple differenced GPS carrier phases
    Bae, Tae-Suk
    Grejner-Brzezinska, Dorota
    Kwon, Jay Hymn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 2007, 60 (02): : 217 - 232
  • [3] ORBIT DETERMINATION USING NONLINEAR PARTICLE FILTER AND GPS MEASUREMENTS
    Pardal, Paula C. P. M.
    Moraes, Rodolpho V.
    Kuga, Helio K.
    [J]. ASTRODYNAMICS 2013, PTS I-III, 2014, 150 : 1077 - 1092
  • [4] DETERMINATION OF CLOCK OFFSET USING GPS CARRIER PHASE MEASUREMENTS
    Ha, Jihyun
    Park, Kwan-Dong
    lee, Chang-Bok
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2005, 22 (04) : 491 - 500
  • [5] Dynamic orbit determination for the EOS laser altimeter satellite (EOS ALT/GLAS) using GPS measurements
    Rim, HJ
    Davis, GW
    Schutz, BE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 44 (03): : 409 - 424
  • [6] Dynamic orbit determination for the EOS laser altimeter satellite (EOS ALT/GLAS) using GPS measurements
    Rim, HJ
    Davis, GW
    Schutz, BE
    [J]. ASTRODYNAMICS 1995, 1996, 90 : 1187 - 1201
  • [7] Reduced Dynamic Orbit Determination Using Differenced Phase in Adjacent Epochs for Spaceborne Dual-frequency GPS
    Gu Defeng
    Yi Dongyun
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2011, 24 (06) : 789 - 796
  • [8] Analysis of Attitude Determination Methods Using GPS Carrier Phase Measurements
    Baroni, Leandro
    Kuga, Helio Koiti
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2012, 2012
  • [9] GPS Based Reduced-Dynamic Orbit Determination for Low Earth Orbiters with Ambiguity Fixing
    Yang, Yang
    Yue, Xiaokui
    Yuan, Jianping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2015, 2015
  • [10] Precise orbit determination based on raw GPS measurements
    Norbert Zehentner
    Torsten Mayer-Gürr
    [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2016, 90 : 275 - 286