Evaluation of logit and probit models in mode-choice situation

被引:16
|
作者
Ghareib, AH
机构
[1] Public Works Dept., Faculty of Engrg., Ain Shams Univ.
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1996)122:4(282)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Logit and probit models are statistical tools that are well suited to analyze modal split situation. Logit is superior to probit from the analytical point-of-view, whereas the probit has more reliable theoretical basis. The main objective of this paper is to compare and evaluate the predictive ability of logit and probit models when applied in mode choice context. Two transit modes operating in different cities of the Saudi Kingdom were analyzed. The attributes of transport system, traveller, and trip were considered as they represent the major components of the utility function. Including transport system attributes was termed as a partial-specified model, while submitting traveller and trip attributes was denoted as a full-specified model. The evaluation stage was based on various criteria such as inconsistency and significance of model's coefficients, goodness-of-fit-measure, outlier analysis and market segment test. It is recommended to use full-specified model because of its ability to replicate the overall process of mode choice more accurately. Besides, the writer suggests not to calibrate the complicated models such as probit when analyzing the situation of a binary mode choice because logit model shows more accurate predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 290
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A weighted logit freight mode-choice model
    Rich, J.
    Holmblad, P. M.
    Hansen, C. O.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2009, 45 (06) : 1006 - 1019
  • [2] Optimal Supply Control for Shared Mobility with Logit Mode-Choice Dynamics
    Goswami, Subhajit
    Tallapragada, Pavankumar
    Rambha, Tarun
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ITSC), 2021, : 3509 - 3514
  • [3] APPLICATION OF BEHAVIOURAL MODE-CHOICE MODELS TO LEISURE TRAVEL
    COLLINGS, JJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1974, 6 (02) : 169 - 183
  • [4] Multinomial probit and multinomial logit: a comparison of choice models for voting research
    Dow, JK
    Endersby, JW
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2004, 23 (01) : 107 - 122
  • [5] WORK-TRIP MODE-CHOICE MODELS FOR SOUTH-AFRICA
    STOPHER, PR
    WILMOT, CG
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING JOURNAL OF ASCE, 1979, 105 (06): : 595 - 608
  • [6] LOGIT AND PROBIT MODELS - A JUVENILE JUSTICE PROGRAM-EVALUATION
    ROSENTHAL, JA
    ROSENTHAL, DH
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH & ABSTRACTS, 1991, 27 (03): : 16 - 21
  • [7] Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups
    Williams, Richard
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2009, 37 (04) : 531 - 559
  • [8] Logit and Probit Models Explaining Mode Choice and Frequency of Public Transit Ridership among University Students in Krakow, Poland
    Masoumi, Houshmand
    Mehriar, Melika
    Nosal-Hoy, Katarzyna
    [J]. URBAN SCIENCE, 2024, 8 (03)
  • [9] Identification and decompositions in probit and logit models
    Choe, Chung
    Jung, SeEun
    Oaxaca, Ronald L.
    [J]. EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 59 (03) : 1479 - 1492
  • [10] Identification and decompositions in probit and logit models
    Chung Choe
    SeEun Jung
    Ronald L. Oaxaca
    [J]. Empirical Economics, 2020, 59 : 1479 - 1492