Proactive infliximab is more effective than vedolizumab in inducing fecal calprotectin remission in inflammatory bowel disease

被引:3
|
作者
Fernandes, Samuel Raimundo [1 ]
Rodrigues, Ines Coelho [1 ]
Serrazina, Juliana [1 ]
Botto, Ines Ayala [1 ]
Bernardo, Sonia [1 ]
Goncalves, Ana Rita [1 ]
Valente, Ana [1 ]
Santos, Paula Moura [1 ]
Correia, Luis Araujo [1 ]
Marinho, Rui Tato [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Lisboa Norte EPE, Hosp Santa Maria, Serv Gastrenterol & Hepatol, Av Prof Egas Moniz, P-1649035 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Inflammatory bowel disease; proactive therapeutic drug monitoring; infliximab; vedolizumab; fecal calprotectin; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/00365521.2022.2076567
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Current evidence suggests vedolizumab (VDZ) may be as effective as Infliximab (IFX) in inflammatory bowel disease. It is unknown if proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (PTDM) of IFX may improve these results. Methods Case-control study including consecutive patients with primary response to conventional IFX (n = 70), proactive IFX (n = 148), and VDZ (n = 95). PTDM was performed at week 14 and every other infusion, aiming at a trough level between 5 and 10 mu g/ml. The primary outcome was fecal calprotectin (Fc) remission (<250 mu g/g) at 1 year of treatment. Secondary outcomes included Fc remission at week 14 (proactive IFX/VDZ), clinical remission, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, and surgery at 1-year of follow-up. Results Proactive IFX was superior to conventional IFX and VDZ in inducing Fc remission at 1-year (69.4% vs 47.1% vs 37.9%, p = .003 and p < .001). Results remained significant in biologic naive patients (70.8% vs 44.4% vs 51.4%, p = .001 and p = .043) but comparisons between conventional IFX and VDZ were not significant (p = .265 and p = .664). In multivariate analysis correcting for prior biologic exposure, proactive IFX was more effective than conventional IFX (OR 2.480 95%CI [1.367-4.499], p = .003) and VDZ (OR 3.467 95%CI [1.578-7.617], p = .002) in inducing Fc remission. Amongst secondary outcomes, only clinical remission was significant between proactive IFX and VDZ in the overall cohort (80.4% vs 55.8%, p < .001) and in biologic naive patients (80.2% vs 62.9%, p = .043). Fc remission at 1-year was associated with better results in most secondary outcomes. Conclusion Proactive IFX was superior to VDZ in inducing Fc remission at 1-year, which was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Current evidence suggests that vedolizumab may be as effective as Infliximab in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. There have been no studies comparing vedolizumab with proactively optimized Infliximab based on trough levels. We confirm that conventional IFX is as effective as vedolizumab but proactive IFX appears superior to vedolizumab in inducing fecal calprotectin remission. Fecal calprotectin remission associates with better clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1202 / 1208
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring is more effective than conventional management in inducing fecal calprotectin remission in inflammatory bowel disease
    Fernandes, Samuel Raimundo
    Serrazina, Juliana
    Rodrigues, Ines Coelho
    Bernardo, Sonia
    Goncalves, Ana Rita
    Valente, Ana
    Baldaia, Cilenia
    Santos, Paula Moura
    Correia, Luis Araujo
    Marinho, Rui Tato
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 33 (12) : 1539 - 1546
  • [2] Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is more effective than Conventional Management in Inducing Fecal Calprotectin remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Pedro, J.
    Rodrigues, I.
    Fernandes, S.
    Goncalves, A. R.
    Bernardo, S.
    Baldaia, C.
    Valente, A.
    Moura Santos, P.
    Correia, L.
    Tato Marinho, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2021, 15 : S386 - S386
  • [3] Proactive infliximab is superior to either conventional infliximab and vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Rodrigues, I.
    Serrazina, J.
    Botto, I.
    Fernandes, S.
    Bernardo, S.
    Goncalves, A. R.
    Moura Santos, P.
    Valente, A.
    Correia, L.
    Tato Marinho, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2022, 16 : I543 - I543
  • [4] Proactive infliximab is superior to either conventional infliximab and vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Rodrigues, I.
    Serrazina, J.
    Botto, I.
    Fernandes, S.
    Bernardo, S.
    Goncalves, A. R.
    Moura Santos, P.
    Valente, A.
    Correia, L.
    Tato Marinho, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2022, 16 : I543 - I543
  • [5] Fecal calprotectin is an early predictor of endoscopic response and histologic remission after the start of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease
    Pauwels, Renske W. M.
    van der Woude, Christien J.
    Erler, Nicole S.
    de Vries, Annemarie C.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 13
  • [6] Fecal Calprotectin Does Not Predict Endoscopic Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Falvey, James D.
    Gearry, Richard B.
    Day, Andrew S.
    [J]. INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2013, 19 (06) : E80 - E81
  • [7] Could Fecal Calprotectin Guide the Therapeutic Regimen of Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease?
    Freitas, Marta
    Magalhaes, Rui
    de Castro, Francisca Dias
    Moreira, Maria Joao
    Cotter, Jose
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S7 - S8
  • [8] Infliximab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease rapidly decreases fecal calprotectin levels
    Hamalainen, Anssi
    Sipponen, Taina
    Kolho, Kaija-Leena
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (47) : 5166 - 5171
  • [9] Infliximab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease rapidly decreases fecal calprotectin levels
    Anssi Hmlinen
    Taina Sipponen
    Kaija-Leena Kolho
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 17 (47) : 5166 - 5171
  • [10] Fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease
    Walsham, Natalie E.
    Sherwood, Roy A.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 9 : 21 - 29