The "How" and "Why" of Including Gender and Age in Ethnobotanical Research and Community-Based Resource Management

被引:33
|
作者
Mueller, Jocelyn G. [1 ]
Boubacar, Riyana [2 ]
Guimbo, Iro Dan [3 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Management, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Minist Hydraul & Environm, Direct Gen Eaux & Forets, Niamey, Niger
[3] Univ Abdou Moumouni, Fac Agron, Niamey, Niger
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Participatory research methods; Stakeholder participation; Local ethnobotanical knowledge; West Africa; Niger; TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; FOREST; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-014-0517-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the process and outcome of participatory methods for stakeholder identification. We used focus group style participatory methodology to engage local residents in identifying key sub-groups relevant to conservation in Boumba, Niger. We then conducted a quantitative pictorial recognition study to measure the diversity of local useful plant knowledge across groups. The community identified six gender and age-class groupings relevant to the study. The effect of a participant's gender, socially-defined age class or the interaction of the two factors on the number of plants recognized varied by plant use. Medicinal plant knowledge was highest among elders. Food plant knowledge of food plants increased with age for women only. Where as the interaction of age and gender was strongest on fodder plant knowledge, where mid-aged men scored highest. We reflect on the impact that heterogeneity of local botanical knowledge has on our understanding of local natural resource use and the strengths of using a participatory approach to identifying the stakeholder groups which underlie this heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 78
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The “How” and “Why” of Including Gender and Age in Ethnobotanical Research and Community-Based Resource Management
    Jocelyn G. Müller
    Riyana Boubacar
    Iro Dan Guimbo
    [J]. AMBIO, 2015, 44 : 67 - 78
  • [2] A snapshot of community-based research in canada: Who? What? Why? How?
    Flicker, Sarah
    Savan, Beth
    Kolenda, Brian
    Mildenberger, Matto
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2008, 23 (01) : 106 - 114
  • [3] Strengthening Community-Based Tourism in a new resource-based island nation: Why and how?
    Tolkach, Denis
    King, Brian
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 48 : 386 - 398
  • [4] Partnerships for Empowerment: Participatory Research for Community-based Natural Resource Management
    Berardi, Gigi
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 176 : 116 - 117
  • [5] Partnerships for Empowerment: Participatory Research for Community-Based Natural Resource Management
    Gordon, Jason
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 74 (03) : 457 - 459
  • [6] Partnerships for Empowerment: Participatory Research for Community-Based Natural Resource Management
    Sturtevant, Victoria
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2011, 24 (03) : 315 - 317
  • [7] Rethinking community in community-based natural resource management
    Stone, Moren Tibabo
    Nyaupane, Gyan
    [J]. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 45 (01) : 17 - 31
  • [8] A REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
    Milupi, I. D.
    Somers, M. J.
    Ferguson, W.
    [J]. APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 15 (04): : 1121 - 1143
  • [9] Community-based natural resource management in Kenya
    Ayoo, Collins
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2007, 18 (05) : 531 - 541
  • [10] Diversity of community relationships in community-based natural resource management
    Lamug, Corazon B.
    [J]. PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST, 2008, 91 (02): : 206 - 227