Analysis of the influencing factors of energy-related carbon emissions in Kazakhstan at different stages

被引:8
|
作者
Xiong, Chuanhe [1 ]
Chen, Shuang [1 ]
Gao, Qun [1 ]
Xu, Liting [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Watershed Geog Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Energy-related carbon emissions; LMDI method; Development stages; Kazakhstan; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; LMDI DECOMPOSITION; CO2; EMISSIONS; FINANCIAL CRISIS; CHINA; DRIVERS; CONSUMPTION; MITIGATION; INTENSITY; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-09750-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study analyzes Kazakhstan's influencing factors of energy-related carbon emissions in different stages, and the study period (1992-2014) was divided into four stages by using the logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) method. In the low efficiency and high output stage, Kazakhstan had the most energy-related carbon emissions. The total energy-related carbon emissions might be positive or negative in the high efficiency and high output stage and the low efficiency and low output stage, and this was mainly determined by the energy intensity effect or the economic output effect. Different influencing factors had different effects in the different stages from 1992 to 2014. The economic output effect was the first contributor for promoting energy-related carbon emissions, and the energy intensity factor was the first contributor for suppressing energy-related carbon emissions from 1992 to 2014. Finally, policy recommendations in terms of the main influencing factors are put forward, including the low-carbon economic development mode transformation, technological innovation, and renewable energy development.
引用
收藏
页码:36630 / 36638
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of the influencing factors of energy-related carbon emissions in Kazakhstan at different stages
    Chuanhe Xiong
    Shuang Chen
    Qun Gao
    Liting Xu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 36630 - 36638
  • [2] The Dynamics of Energy-Related Carbon Emissions and Their Influencing Factors in the Yangtze River Delta, China
    Li, Xiang'er
    Gong, Jiajun
    Ni, Xuan
    Zheng, Zhiyi
    Zhao, Qingshan
    Hu, Yi'na
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (12)
  • [3] Influencing Factors of Energy-Related CO2 Emissions in China: A Decomposition Analysis
    Wang, Guokui
    Chen, Xingpeng
    Zhang, Zilong
    Niu, Chaolan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (10) : 14408 - 14426
  • [4] ENERGY-RELATED CARBON EMISSIONS AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS DECOMPOSITION IN THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA REGION, CHINA
    Tang, Z. X.
    Dong, S. S.
    Xiong, H. M.
    [J]. APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 20 (04): : 3467 - 3485
  • [5] Analysis of the decomposition of factors affecting energy-related carbon emissions in Guangxi province, China
    Zhou, Huijie
    Zou, Yi
    Kuang, Yaoqiu
    Huang, Ningsheng
    Wang, Wenxiu
    Wang, Dehui
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GEO-MARINE SCIENCES, 2017, 46 (02) : 229 - 244
  • [6] Trend analysis for the projection of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions
    Tutmez, Bulent
    [J]. ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2006, 24 (1-2) : 139 - 149
  • [7] Decomposition and decoupling analysis of energy-related carbon emissions in Turkey
    Etem Karakaya
    Aziz Bostan
    Mustafa Özçağ
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 32080 - 32091
  • [8] Decomposition and decoupling analysis of energy-related carbon emissions in Turkey
    Karakaya, Etem
    Bostan, Aziz
    Ozcag, Mustafa
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (31) : 32080 - 32091
  • [9] Analysis of Energy-Related Carbon Emissions in Inner Mongolia, China
    Tseng, Sheng-Wen
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (24)
  • [10] How do geographical factors affect energy-related carbon emissions? A Chinese panel analysis
    Jiang, Yan
    Bai, Hongtao
    Feng, Xiangyu
    Luo, Wen
    Huang, Yanying
    Xu, He
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 93 : 1226 - 1235