Radiation oncology peer review in Australia and New Zealand

被引:2
|
作者
Chin, Stephen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Or, Michelle [4 ]
Ong, Wee Loon [5 ,6 ]
Millar, Jeremy [5 ]
Chilkuri, Madhavi [7 ]
Vinod, Shalini [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hlth, Olivia Newton John Canc Wellness & Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Westmead Hosp, Crown Princess Mary Canc Ctr Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Alfred Hlth Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Townsville Univ Hosp, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[8] Liverpool Hosp, Canc Therapy Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ New South Wales, Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
feedback; peer review; quality improvement; radiation oncology; radiotherapy; LUNG-CANCER; QUALITY; IMPACT; THERAPY; SAFETY; IMPROVE; ROUNDS; EFFICIENCY; OUTCOMES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/1754-9485.13360
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Peer review is a part of high quality care within radiation oncology, designed to achieve the best outcomes for patients. We discuss the importance of and evidence for peer review in clinical practice. The Royal Australia and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) has evolved a Peer Review Assessment Tool (PRAT) since 1999. We report the results of a RANZCR faculty survey conducted in radiation oncology facilities across Australia and New Zealand to guide the 2019 PRAT revision process, and discuss the development and implementation of the 2019 PRAT. Peer-review processes are now mandated as a component of Australian and International Quality Standards. Several practical recommendations might address challenges for effective implementation of peer review process in routine clinical practice. This includes prioritising tumour sites and treatment techniques for peer review within the time and resources constraints of each institution, improving resource allocation, ensuring optimal timing and duration for peer review meetings, and adopting multi-centre virtual peer review meeting where necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 266
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Requirements for radiation oncology physics in Australia and New Zealand
    Oliver L.
    Fitchew R.
    Drew J.
    [J]. Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2001, 24 (1): : 1 - 18
  • [2] Gender diversity and leadership in Radiation Oncology in Australia and New Zealand
    Hesselberg, Gina
    James, Melissa
    Turner, Sandra
    Gupta, Nishant
    Mackenzie, Penny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 67 (02) : 203 - 211
  • [3] Oncology and Radiation Oncology Awareness in Final Year Medical Students in Australia and New Zealand
    Bravery, Benjamin D.
    Shi, Kate
    Nicholls, Luke
    Chelvarajah, Revadhi
    Minh Thi Tieu
    Turner, Sandra
    Windsor, Apsara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2020, 35 (06) : 1227 - 1236
  • [4] Oncology and Radiation Oncology Awareness in Final Year Medical Students in Australia and New Zealand
    Benjamin D. Bravery
    Kate Shi
    Luke Nicholls
    Revadhi Chelvarajah
    Minh Thi Tieu
    Sandra Turner
    Apsara Windsor
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Education, 2020, 35 : 1227 - 1236
  • [5] Characteristics of Chief Investigators of Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials in Australia and New Zealand
    Nguyen, H.
    Montgomery, R.
    Sundaresan, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E142 - E142
  • [6] Communication and collaboration skills training in Radiation Oncology in Australia and New Zealand: A qualitative study
    Levy, David C.
    Naehrig, Diana
    Sullivan, Lisa
    Chin, Yaw S.
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (05) : E356 - E362
  • [7] Radiation Oncology Peer Review: Measuring Quality
    Johnstone, Peter A. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 10 (05) : 314 - 316
  • [8] Radiation Oncology Peer Review in a Community Setting
    Dragojevic, I.
    Rahn, D. A.
    Hoopes, D. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E614 - E615
  • [9] 100% peer review in radiation oncology: is it feasible?
    E. Martin-Garcia
    F. Celada-Álvarez
    M. J. Pérez-Calatayud
    M. Rodriguez-Pla
    O. Prato-Carreño
    D. Farga-Albiol
    O. Pons-Llanas
    S. Roldán-Ortega
    E. Collado-Ballesteros
    F. J. Martinez-Arcelus
    Y. Bernisz-Diaz
    V. A. Macias
    J. Chimeno
    J. Gimeno-Olmos
    F. Lliso
    V. Carmona
    J. C. Ruiz
    J. Pérez-Calatayud
    A. Tormo-Micó
    A. J. Conde-Moreno
    [J]. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2020, 22 : 2341 - 2349
  • [10] The Promise and Burden of Peer Review in Radiation Oncology
    Chera, Bhishamjit S.
    Mazur, Lukasz
    Adams, Robert D.
    Marks, Lawrence B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2016, 12 (03) : 196 - +