Physical recovery after laparoscopic vs. open liver resection - A prospective cohort study

被引:3
|
作者
Kampf, S. [1 ]
Sponder, M. [2 ]
Bergler-Klein, J. [2 ]
Sandurkov, C. [1 ]
Fitschek, F. [1 ]
Bodingbauer, M. [1 ]
Stremitzer, S. [1 ]
Kaczirek, K. [1 ]
Schwarz, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Div Gen Surg, Dept Surg, Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med 2, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Physical recovery; Liver surgery; Minimal invasive; Laparoscopic; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; LEARNING-CURVE; SURGERY; FEASIBILITY; METASTASES; STATEMENT; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.040
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While the number of laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) is increasing worldwide, its impact on physical recovery remains unclear. We hypothesized that LLR is associated with better physical recovery than open liver resection (OLR). To address this question, we investigated the impact of laparoscopic liver resection compared to open liver resection on physical recovery in a prospective trial. Methods: Twenty-one patients who underwent LR were included in this study (11 OLR (52.4%) and 10 LLR (47.6%), respectively). Physical recovery was measured by bicycle stress testing at months 1 and 6 after surgery and compared to preoperative stress testing. Standardized performance for bicycle stress testing was calculated based on age, sex, height and weight. Physical recovery was compared between groups as change of performance (%). Results: Median age was 58 years (Inter Quartile Range (IQR): 44-68), and the main indications for LR were colorectal liver metastases (n = 10; 45%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6; 27%). The one-month change of performance level was - 8% (IQR: -12-1) compared to the preoperative level with no significant difference between open and laparoscopic LR (LLR: -8% (-11 - 1); OLR: -6% (-12 - 4), p = 0.833). Furthermore, 6 months postoperatively, patients in both groups had not reached back their preoperative performance level (LLR: -5.7% ( - 8.4 - 18.6); OLR -4. 8% ( -12.6 - 1.9), p = 0.833). Conclusion: In this study, we report an impaired physical recovery after LR that was not fully restored 6 months after surgery. There was no significant difference between open and laparoscopic LR in terms of bicycle stress testing. Limitations of the study include the limited sample size and differences, albeit non-statistically significant, in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. To rule out a possible role of age or underlying indication for liver resection on physical recovery, future randomized controlled trials need to be performed.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 229
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preliminary results in physical recovery after laparoscopic vs. open liver resection
    Kampf, S. Stephanie
    Schwarz, C.
    Sponder, M.
    Bergler-Klein, J.
    Sandurkov, C.
    Kaczirek, K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 143 - 143
  • [2] A commentary on: "Physical recovery after laparoscopic vs. open liver resection - A prospective cohort study" [Int J Surg 2019;72:224-229]
    Takaoka, Makoto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 74 : 22 - 22
  • [3] Laparoscopic vs. open Resection of colorectal Liver Metastases
    Schrempf, M.
    Anthuber, M.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2019, 90 : S72 - S72
  • [4] Surgical outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection vs. open liver resection: A retrospective propensity scorematched cohort study
    Shengtao Lin
    Fan Wu
    Liming Wang
    Yunhe Liu
    Yiling Zheng
    Tana Siqin
    Weiqi Rong
    Jianxiong Wu
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2019, 31 (05) : 818 - 824
  • [5] Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Cirrhotic Liver: A Case–Control Study
    Riccardo Memeo
    Nicola de’Angelis
    Philippe Compagnon
    Chady Salloum
    Daniel Cherqui
    Alexis Laurent
    Daniel Azoulay
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 2919 - 2926
  • [6] Surgical outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection vs. open liver resection: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study
    Lin, Shengtao
    Wu, Fan
    Wang, Liming
    Liu, Yunhe
    Zheng, Yiling
    Siqin, Tana
    Rong, Weiqi
    Wu, Jianxiong
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 31 (05) : 818 - 824
  • [7] Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Cirrhotic Liver: A Case-Control Study
    Memeo, Riccardo
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Compagnon, Philippe
    Salloum, Chady
    Cherqui, Daniel
    Laurent, Alexis
    Azoulay, Daniel
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (11) : 2919 - 2926
  • [8] Laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for malignant liver disease. A systematic review
    Rao, A.
    Rao, G.
    Alkari, B.
    Ahmed, I.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 : 105 - 105
  • [9] Laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for malignant liver disease. A systematic review
    Rao, Ahsan
    Rao, Ghaus
    Ahmed, Irfan
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2012, 10 (04): : 194 - 201
  • [10] Laparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer
    Fleshman, JW
    Wexner, SD
    Anvari, M
    LaTulippe, JF
    Birnbaum, EH
    Kodner, IJ
    Read, TE
    Nogueras, JJ
    Weiss, EG
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1999, 42 (07) : 930 - 939