A Non-Market Valuation Approach to Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis for Sanitary Landfill Project Appraisal

被引:3
|
作者
Ab Rahim, Nik Nor Rahimah Nik [1 ]
Othman, Jamal [1 ]
Salleh, Norlida Hanim Mohd [1 ]
Chamhuri, Norshamliza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Econ & Management, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
non-market valuation; choice modeling; cost-benefit analysis; sanitary landfill; externalities; SOLID-WASTE MANAGEMENT; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC VALUE; SOCIAL COSTS; MALAYSIA; CONTEXT; INVOLVEMENT; CHALLENGES; PEOPLE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/su13147718
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Extensive non-engineered landfilling practice in developing countries has raised environmental concerns, but operating a sanitary landfill appears infeasible due to financial incapability. This study aims to determine the feasibility of a sanitary landfill project by including its environmental values into the project appraisal while simultaneously applying three policy-relevant methods-non-market valuation, benefits transfer, and cost-benefit analysis-in two study areas in Peninsular Malaysia. The non-market valuation study used choice modeling, a questionnaire-based technique, to elicit willingness to pay among 624 households toward the environmental attributes of the sanitary landfill. Their responses resulted in the monetary values of the environmental attributes by referring to implicit prices of leachate discharge, bad odor, disease vector and view. The implicit prices of bad odor (RM2.29 per month) and view (RM3.59 per month) in the two study areas were transferable and used as a proxy of additional solid waste disposal payment in environmental cost-benefit analysis. Positive net present value offers empirical evidence of the feasibility of the sanitary landfill project. The findings show that the inclusion of environmental values in project appraisals increases the chances of implementing sanitary landfills, providing a new approach to address the environmental concerns in developing countries. Future research should consider the external costs along with the external benefits to allow for a comprehensive comparison between environmental values in environmental cost-benefit analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Public Project Appraisal
    Brzozowska, Krystyna
    [J]. INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2007, (03): : 78 - 83
  • [2] Cost-benefit analysis and project appraisal in developing countries.
    White, H
    [J]. MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 1998, 66 (01): : 130 - 131
  • [3] Cost-benefit analysis and project appraisal in developing countries.
    Batabyal, AA
    [J]. KYKLOS, 1997, 50 (02) : 273 - 274
  • [4] Cost-benefit analysis and project appraisal in developing countries.
    Harvey, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 1998, 34 (04): : 149 - 151
  • [5] Integrating stakeholder analysis in non-market valuation of environmental assets
    Kontogianni, A
    Skourtos, MS
    Langford, IH
    Bateman, IJ
    Georgiou, S
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 37 (01) : 123 - 138
  • [6] The international handbook on non-market environmental valuation
    Laing, Tim
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2012, 30 (04): : 748 - 749
  • [7] The international handbook on non-market environmental valuation
    Laing, Tim
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2012, 30 (01): : 186 - 187
  • [9] PARTIAL VALUATION IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    Rowell, Arden
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2012, 64 (03) : 723 - 742
  • [10] Rural Communities Public Project Valuation Using Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Baranauskiene, Jurgita
    Alekneviciene, Vilija
    [J]. RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2013: PROCEEDINGS, VOL6, BOOK 1, 2013, 6 (01): : 25 - 31